Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold: Which One Should You Buy?
Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 94.2/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra wins 4 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedGalaxy Z Fold8 Ultra9886
- CameraGalaxy Z Fold8 Ultra9680
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryGalaxy Z Fold8 Ultra8980
- DisplayGalaxy Z Fold8 Ultra9894
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueGoogle Pixel 11 Pro Fold5685
- Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,806 mAh
- Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has the faster chipQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) vs Google Tensor G6
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra wins — BeastScore 94.2/100
The Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (5,000 mAh vs 4,806 mAh) and faster chip (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) vs Google Tensor G6).
Optical telephoto zoom (1 telephoto lens)
Reliable all-round performance.
Common questions
Which is better: Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold?
The Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (5,000 mAh vs 4,806 mAh) and faster chip (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) vs Google Tensor G6). BeastScore: Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra 94.2/100, Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold 84.4/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold?
Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has a 8-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold has a 8-inch display and 4806 mAh battery.
How do Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold compare for speed?
Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra scores 98/100 for performance; Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold scores 86/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs Galaxy Z Fold8
Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs Google Pixel 11 5G
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 5G
Gear for the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep DiveIntel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →





