BeastCompare

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs Redmi Note 13 Pro+: Which One Should You Buy?

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 94.2/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2026

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
94/ 100
Launch price$1,799
Xiaomi · 2023

Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Redmi Note 13 Pro+
91/ 100
Launch price$399
Head-to-head

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra wins overall; Redmi Note 13 Pro+ takes 5 of 8 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
3 wins
Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Redmi Note 13 Pro+
5 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
Galaxy Z Fold8 UltraRedmi Note 13 Pro+
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedGalaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
    98
    90
  • CameraRedmi Note 13 Pro+
    96
    99
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieRedmi Note 13 Pro+
    40
    60
  • BatteryRedmi Note 13 Pro+
    89
    90
  • DisplayGalaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
    98
    88
  • ConnectivityGalaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
    100
    75
  • SecurityRedmi Note 13 Pro+
    14
    100
  • ValueRedmi Note 13 Pro+
    56
    80
Key differences
  • Redmi Note 13 Pro+ charges faster120W vs 45W
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has the bigger screen8" vs 6.67"
  • Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is lighter204.5 g vs 215 g
  • Redmi Note 13 Pro+ launched cheaper$399 vs $1,799
  • Redmi Note 13 Pro+ has a sharper selfie camera16 MP vs 10 MP
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has newer Bluetooth6 vs 5.3
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has the faster chipQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has faster Wi-FiWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E
  • Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is better protected from water and dustIP68 vs IP48
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
  • ✓200 MP main camera
  • ✓8" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Redmi Note 13 Pro+
  • ✓10.5 g lighter (204.5 g vs 215 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$1,400 cheaper at launch ($399 vs $1,799)
  • ✓200 MP main camera

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy Z Fold8 UltraRedmi Note 13 Pro+
1. Display & Screen🏆 Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typeFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak)AMOLED
Screen Size8"6.67"
Resolution & Density2256 x 2504 pixels (~422 ppi) (422 ppi)2712x1220 (446 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz adaptive120 Hz
Brightness1432 nits (measured)1,800 nits peak
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus Ceramic 3 / Flex TitaniumNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedAdreno 710
Operating SystemAndroid 17, One UI 9 (7 major OS updates) 17Android 13
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB / 1TB256GB / 512GB
Storage SpeedUFS 4.xNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Redmi Note 13 Pro+ Wins Camera
Primary Camera200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", OIS, multi-directional PDAF, OIS200 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Samsung HP3
Telephoto Zoom10 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.4, 67mm, OISNone (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera50 MP, f/1.9, 120˚ (ultrawide)8 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
8K@30fps4K@30/60/120fps1080p@240fps10-bit HDRHDR10+gyro-EISOIS
Not listed
Front Video
4K@30/60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens10 MP, f/2.2, 18mm (ultrawide)16 MP, f/2.4
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Redmi Note 13 Pro+ Lightest Chassis
DimensionsUnfolded: 158.4 x 143.2 x 4.1 mm, Folded: 158.4 x 72.8 x 8.9 mm161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm
Weight215 g204.5 g
Build MaterialsGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus Ceramic 3) folded, plastic front unfolded, glass back, aluminum frameNot listed
SIM TypeNano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (dual active)Not listed
Water ResistanceIP48 dust and water resistantIP68
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Redmi Note 13 Pro+ Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging45W wired fast charging120W wired fast charging
Wireless Charging20W wireless chargingNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerYes, with stereo speakersNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 (802.11be, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct)Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.3
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 3.2, OTGUSB-C 2.0
NFCYes (Samsung Pay Visa, MasterCard certified)Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,799$399
Our verdict

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra wins — BeastScore 94.2/100

The Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger screen (8" vs 6.67") and newer Bluetooth (6 vs 5.3). The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is worth a look if you prefer its faster charging (120W vs 45W).

Buy Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra if you want

Optical telephoto zoom (1 telephoto lens) · Larger display: 8" vs 6.67"

Buy Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you want

Faster wired charging: 120W vs 45W · Lighter: 204.5 g vs 215 g (11 g less)

Common questions

Which is better: Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or Redmi Note 13 Pro+?

The Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger screen (8" vs 6.67") and newer Bluetooth (6 vs 5.3). The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is worth a look if you prefer its faster charging (120W vs 45W). BeastScore: Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra 94.2/100, Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 90.8/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and Redmi Note 13 Pro+?

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has a 8-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Redmi Note 13 Pro+ has a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and Redmi Note 13 Pro+ compare for speed?

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra scores 98/100 for performance; Redmi Note 13 Pro+ scores 90/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 5G
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 5G

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold

OnePlus 16
Oneplus

OnePlus 16

Xiaomi 12T Pro
Xiaomi

Xiaomi 12T Pro

Vivo X300s
Vivo

Vivo X300s

Oppo Find X9 Ultra 5G
Oppo

Oppo Find X9 Ultra 5G

Motorola Razr Fold 5G
Motorola

Motorola Razr Fold 5G

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs Galaxy Z Fold8

Compare →
vs

Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G (China)

Compare →
vs

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+

Compare →
vs

Redmi Note 12 Pro+ vs Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 (China) vs Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Compare →
vs

Redmi Note 13 Pro vs Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Compare →

Gear for the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsAirPods Pro 3 vs Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs BoseWhich flagship earbuds fit your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsApple Watch vs Galaxy Watch vs Pixel WatchThe right watch for your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →