BeastCompare

Galaxy Z Fold8 vs Redmi Note 13 Pro+: Which One Should You Buy?

Galaxy Z Fold8 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 91.8/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2026

Galaxy Z Fold8

Galaxy Z Fold8
92/ 100
Launch price$1,649
Xiaomi · 2023

Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Redmi Note 13 Pro+
91/ 100
Launch price$399
Head-to-head

Galaxy Z Fold8 wins overall; Redmi Note 13 Pro+ takes 5 of 8 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Galaxy Z Fold8
Galaxy Z Fold8
3 wins
Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Redmi Note 13 Pro+
5 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
Galaxy Z Fold8Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedGalaxy Z Fold8
    96
    90
  • CameraRedmi Note 13 Pro+
    92
    99
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieRedmi Note 13 Pro+
    40
    60
  • BatteryRedmi Note 13 Pro+
    86
    90
  • DisplayGalaxy Z Fold8
    95
    88
  • ConnectivityGalaxy Z Fold8
    100
    75
  • SecurityRedmi Note 13 Pro+
    14
    100
  • ValueRedmi Note 13 Pro+
    60
    80
Key differences
  • Redmi Note 13 Pro+ has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh
  • Redmi Note 13 Pro+ charges faster120W vs 45W
  • Redmi Note 13 Pro+ has a sharper main camera200 MP vs 50 MP
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 has the bigger screen7.6" vs 6.67"
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 is lighter201 g vs 204.5 g
  • Redmi Note 13 Pro+ launched cheaper$399 vs $1,649
  • Redmi Note 13 Pro+ has a sharper selfie camera16 MP vs 10 MP
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 has newer Bluetooth6 vs 5.3
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 has the faster chipQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 has faster Wi-FiWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E
  • Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is better protected from water and dustIP68 vs IP48
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy Z Fold8
  • ✓3.5 g lighter (201 g vs 204.5 g), easier to hold
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓7.6" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Redmi Note 13 Pro+
  • ✓$1,250 cheaper at launch ($399 vs $1,649)
  • ✓Bigger 5,000 mAh battery (+200 mAh)
  • ✓200 MP main camera

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy Z Fold8Redmi Note 13 Pro+
1. Display & Screen🏆 Galaxy Z Fold8 Wins Display
Screen typeFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak)AMOLED
Screen Size7.6"6.67"
Resolution & Density2448 x 1848 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~404 ppi) (404 ppi)2712x1220 (446 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz adaptive120 Hz
Brightness1525 nits (measured)1,800 nits peak
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus Ceramic 3 / Flex TitaniumNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Galaxy Z Fold8 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedAdreno 710
Operating SystemAndroid 17, One UI 9 (7 major OS updates) 17Android 13
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB / 1TB256GB / 512GB
Storage SpeedUFS 4.xNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Redmi Note 13 Pro+ Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", OIS, dual pixel PDAF, OIS200 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Samsung HP3
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera50 MP, f/1.9, 120˚ (ultrawide)8 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
8K@30fps4K@30/60/120fps1080p@240fpsgyro-EISOIS
Not listed
Front Video
4K@30/60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens10 MP, f/2.2, 18mm (ultrawide)16 MP, f/2.4
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Galaxy Z Fold8 Lightest Chassis
DimensionsUnfolded: 161.4 x 123.9 x 4.5 mm, Folded: 81.9 x 123.9 x 9.7 mm161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm
Weight201 g204.5 g
Build MaterialsGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus Ceramic 3) folded, plastic front unfolded, glass back, aluminum frameNot listed
SIM TypeNano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (dual active)Not listed
Water ResistanceIP48 dust and water resistantIP68
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Redmi Note 13 Pro+ Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,800 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging45W wired fast charging120W wired fast charging
Wireless Charging20W wireless chargingNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerYes, with stereo speakersNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 (802.11be, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct)Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.3
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 3.2, OTGUSB-C 2.0
NFCYes (Samsung Pay Visa, MasterCard certified)Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,649$399
Our verdict

Galaxy Z Fold8 wins — BeastScore 91.8/100

The Galaxy Z Fold8 is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger screen (7.6" vs 6.67") and lighter body (201 g vs 204.5 g). The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (5,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh).

Buy Galaxy Z Fold8 if you want

Larger display: 7.6" vs 6.67" · Brighter screen: 3,000 nits vs 1,800 nits

Buy Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you want

Larger battery: 5,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh · Faster wired charging: 120W vs 45W

Common questions

Which is better: Galaxy Z Fold8 or Redmi Note 13 Pro+?

The Galaxy Z Fold8 is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger screen (7.6" vs 6.67") and lighter body (201 g vs 204.5 g). The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (5,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh). BeastScore: Galaxy Z Fold8 91.8/100, Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 90.8/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy Z Fold8 and Redmi Note 13 Pro+?

Galaxy Z Fold8 has a 7.6-inch display and 4800 mAh battery. Redmi Note 13 Pro+ has a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do Galaxy Z Fold8 and Redmi Note 13 Pro+ compare for speed?

Galaxy Z Fold8 scores 96/100 for performance; Redmi Note 13 Pro+ scores 90/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

Apple iPhone Duo
Apple

Apple iPhone Duo

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google

Google Pixel 9 Pro

OnePlus 12R
Oneplus

OnePlus 12R

Xiaomi 12T Pro
Xiaomi

Xiaomi 12T Pro

Vivo X300 Ultra
Vivo

Vivo X300 Ultra

Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Oppo

Oppo Find X9 Ultra

Motorola Edge 70 Pro+ 5G
Motorola

Motorola Edge 70 Pro+ 5G

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Galaxy Z Fold6 vs Galaxy Z Fold8

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs Galaxy Z Fold8

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs Galaxy Z Fold8

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr Fold 5G vs Galaxy Z Fold8

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Z Fold8 vs Pixel 10 Pro Fold

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Z Fold8 vs Apple iPhone Duo

Compare →
vs

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G (China)

Compare →
vs

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+

Compare →

Gear for the Galaxy Z Fold8

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsAirPods Pro 3 vs Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs BoseWhich flagship earbuds fit your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsApple Watch vs Galaxy Watch vs Pixel WatchThe right watch for your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?Tech News
6 min read

Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?

Google quietly raised the Pixel 10a from $499 to $599 in early October, and Samsung pushed the Galaxy A57 up to $599.99 the same week. That puts three "budget" phones at the same $599 starting price as the iPhone 17e. Here is what changed, how the three compare, and which one makes sense now.

Read →