BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Google Nexus 7 (2013) vs Galaxy Folder2
Lab Benchmark Battle

Google Nexus 7 (2013) vs Galaxy Folder2

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Asus · 2013

Google Nexus 7 (2013)

Google Nexus 7 (2013)
61/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2017

Galaxy Folder2

Galaxy Folder2
61/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Google Nexus 7 (2013) BETTER THAN Galaxy Folder2?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Google Nexus 7 (2013)Winner 🏆
Galaxy Folder2

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORGoogle NexusGalaxy Folder2LEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity3,950 mAh1,950 mAh+3,950 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera Sensor5 MP8 MP8 MP
Screen Display Size7"3.8"7"
Chassis Weight290g165g165g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Google Nexus 7 (2013):
  • Larger 3,950 mAh battery capacity (+2,000 mAh more capacity)
  • 5MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • 7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Galaxy Folder2:
  • 125g lighter chassis (165g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 8MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • 3.8" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationGoogle Nexus 7 (2013)Galaxy Folder2
1. Display & Screen🏆 Google Nexus 7 (2013) Wins Display
Screen Type & TechLED-backlit IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colorsTFT capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
Screen Size7"3.8"
Resolution & Density1200x1920 (323 ppi)480x800 (246 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz ProMotion60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Google Nexus 7 (2013) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory2 GB LPDDR2 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage2GB / 32GB2GB / 16GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Google Nexus 7 (2013) Wins Camera
Primary Camera5 MP8 MP
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens1.2 MP5 MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Galaxy Folder2 Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight290 g165 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Google Nexus 7 (2013) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity3,950 mAh1,950 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, WiFi Direct, hotspot
Bluetooth4.0, A2DP, LE4.2, A2DP, LE
USB Port & SpeedmicroUSB 2.0 (SlimPort)microUSB 2.0
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Google Nexus 7 (2013) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Google Nexus 7 (2013) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Google Nexus 7 (2013):
Larger battery capacity: 3,950 mAh (+2,000 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 7" vs max 3.8" for media & multitasking
When to choose Galaxy Folder2:
Lighter body: 165g (125g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Google Nexus 7 (2013) vs Galaxy Folder2

Which is better: Google Nexus 7 (2013) or Galaxy Folder2?

Google Nexus 7 (2013) leads with an overall BeastScore of 60.8/100 compared to Galaxy Folder2 (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Larger battery capacity: 3,950 mAh (+2,000 mAh more) and Significantly larger display: 7" vs max 3.8" for media & multitasking.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Google Nexus 7 (2013) and Galaxy Folder2?

Google Nexus 7 (2013) is equipped with a 7-inch display and 3950 mAh battery, while Galaxy Folder2 features a 3.8-inch display and 1950 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Google Nexus 7 (2013) and Galaxy Folder2?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Google Nexus 7 (2013) achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Galaxy Folder2 scores 60/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read Analysis →
ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
18 min read

ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive architectural deep dive comparing the ASUS ROG Ally X, Valve Steam Deck OLED, and Lenovo Legion Go across AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs. custom Sephiroth APUs, 80Wh vs 50Wh vs 49.2Wh battery thermals, RDNA 3 compute, SteamOS vs Windows 11 optimization, and real-world frametimes.

Read Analysis →
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)Flagship Camera Shootout
14 min read

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)

An architectural teardown and real-world imaging shootout across Apple's 48MP Fusion quad-pixel sensor with 4K120 ProRes LOG, Samsung's 200MP ISOCELL HP2 Quad-Tele system with ProVisual AI Engine, and Google's 50MP GNK sensor paired with Tensor G4 HDRnet and Night Sight Video.

Read Analysis →