BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Huawei MatePad 12 X vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025) GA403UM-QS007WS Gaming
Lab Benchmark Battle

Huawei MatePad 12 X vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025) GA403UM-QS007WS Gaming

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Huawei

Huawei MatePad 12 X

Huawei MatePad 12 X
96/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
ASUS

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025) GA403UM-QS007WS Gaming

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025) GA403UM-QS007WS Gaming
91/ 100
Launch MSRP$2,169 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Huawei MatePad 12 X BETTER THAN Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025) GA403UM-QS007WS Gaming?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Huawei MatePad 12 XWinner 🏆
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025) GA403UM-QS007WS Gaming

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORHuawei MatePadAsus ROGLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity10,100 mAhN/A+10,100 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display SizeN/A14"14"
Chassis Weight555gN/A555g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Huawei MatePad 12 X:
  • 444g lighter chassis (555g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • Larger 10,100 mAh battery capacity (+10,100 mAh more capacity)
Reasons to buy Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025) GA403UM-QS007WS Gaming:
  • $7830 lower launch MSRP ($2169 vs $9999)
  • 14" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationHuawei MatePad 12 XAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025) GA403UM-QS007WS Gaming
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osHarmonyOS 4.2Windows
ram gb1216
camerasmain, selfie
displayIPS LCD, 144Hz, 1000 nits (peak) (2800x1840 pixels)14" (2880x1800) 243 PPI
weight g555
os version4.2
battery mah10100
connectivitynfc: No, usb: USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, magnetic accessory connector, wifi: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, bluetooth: 5.2, A2DP, LE
release date2024-10-222023-01-01
storage options gb8, 12, 256
cpuAMD Opteron 270
gpuGeForce RTX 5060
cpu nameAMD Ryzen 9 270
gpu nameNVIDIA GeForce RTX RTX 5060
gpu typeDedicated
storage gb1024
device categoryGaming
Launch MSRPPrice on request$2169 USD
Editorial Lab Verdict

Huawei MatePad 12 X edges ahead with a BeastScore of 96.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Huawei MatePad 12 X ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Huawei MatePad 12 X:
Higher overall BeastScore: 96.0 vs top rival 91.0 · Larger battery capacity: 10,100 mAh (+10,100 mAh more)
When to choose Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025) GA403UM-QS007WS Gaming:
Significantly larger display: 14" vs max 0" for media & multitasking · Lower launch price: $2169 (save $Infinity)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Huawei MatePad 12 X vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025) GA403UM-QS007WS Gaming

Which is better: Huawei MatePad 12 X or Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025) GA403UM-QS007WS Gaming?

Huawei MatePad 12 X leads with an overall BeastScore of 96.0/100 compared to Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025) GA403UM-QS007WS Gaming (91.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 96.0 vs top rival 91.0 and Larger battery capacity: 10,100 mAh (+10,100 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Huawei MatePad 12 X and Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025) GA403UM-QS007WS Gaming?

Huawei MatePad 12 X is equipped with a display and 10100 mAh battery, while Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025) GA403UM-QS007WS Gaming features a 14-inch display and standard battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Huawei MatePad 12 X and Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025) GA403UM-QS007WS Gaming?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Huawei MatePad 12 X achieves a 94/100 performance score, while Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025) GA403UM-QS007WS Gaming scores 88/100.