iPhone 13 Pro Max vs SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44: Which One Should You Buy?
iPhone 13 Pro Max edges ahead with a BeastScore of 73.5/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
iPhone 13 Pro Max wins 3 of 7 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV447290
- CameraiPhone 13 Pro Max7568
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieiPhone 13 Pro Max6040
- BatteryTie7070
- DisplayiPhone 13 Pro Max8662
- ConnectivityTie5555
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueSM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV445568
- SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 has the bigger battery4,380 mAh vs 4,352 mAh
- SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 has a sharper main camera12.2 MP vs 12 MP
- iPhone 13 Pro Max has the bigger screen6.7" vs 4.58"
- iPhone 13 Pro Max is lighter238 g vs 276 g
- iPhone 13 Pro Max has a sharper selfie camera12 MP vs 10 MP
- SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 has more RAM12 GB vs 6 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄iPhone 13 Pro Max wins — BeastScore 73.5/100
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger screen (6.7" vs 4.58") and lighter body (238 g vs 276 g). The SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (4,380 mAh vs 4,352 mAh).
Optical telephoto zoom (1 telephoto lens) · Larger display: 6.7" vs 4.58"
More RAM: 12 GB vs 6 GB
Common questions
Which is better: iPhone 13 Pro Max or SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44?
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger screen (6.7" vs 4.58") and lighter body (238 g vs 276 g). The SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (4,380 mAh vs 4,352 mAh). BeastScore: iPhone 13 Pro Max 73.5/100, SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 72.7/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between iPhone 13 Pro Max and SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44?
iPhone 13 Pro Max has a 6.7-inch display and 4352 mAh battery. SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 has a 4.58-inch display and 4380 mAh battery.
How do iPhone 13 Pro Max and SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 compare for speed?
iPhone 13 Pro Max scores 72/100 for performance; SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 scores 90/100.
Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)

iPhone 14 Pro
Google Pixel 9 Pro 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB GWVK6 (Google Caiman)

OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)

Xiaomi Mi Mix Flip 2 5G Customized Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2505APX7BC (Xiaomi Bixi)

BBK Vivo Y100i 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2279A (BBK V2279A)

Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
iPhone 13 Pro Max vs iPhone 15 Pro Max
iPhone 13 Pro Max vs iPhone 14 Pro Max
iPhone 13 Pro Max vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 vs Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)
iPhone 13 Pro Max vs iPhone 14 Pro
SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 vs iPhone 16
iPhone 13 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 9 Pro 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB GWVK6 (Google Caiman)
SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB GWVK6 (Google Caiman)
Gear for the iPhone 13 Pro Max
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →
GuideHere are the Apple iPhone Duo alternatives
Explore top alternatives to the $2,000 Apple iPhone Duo, including the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, Xiaomi 18 Fold 5G, Vivo X Fold5 Pro, and OnePlus Open 2.
Read →