BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Lenovo A7-30 A3300 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Lab Benchmark Battle

Lenovo A7-30 A3300 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Lenovo

Lenovo A7-30 A3300

Lenovo A7-30 A3300
74/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
83/ 100
Launch MSRP$1,849.99 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 BETTER THAN Lenovo A7-30 A3300?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Lenovo A7-30 A3300
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORLenovo A7-30Samsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity3,500 mAh4,400 mAh+4,400 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size7"7.6"7.6"
Chassis Weight327g253g253g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Lenovo A7-30 A3300:
  • 7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5:
  • 74g lighter chassis (253g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • $8149.01 lower launch MSRP ($1849.99 vs $9999)
  • Larger 4,400 mAh battery capacity (+900 mAh more capacity)

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationLenovo A7-30 A3300Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 4.2.2Android 13, up to 4 major upgrades
socMediatek MT8382MSnapdragon 8 Gen 2
ram gb112
camerasmain, selfiemain, selfie
displayIPS LCD 7" (600x1024 pixels) 170 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+ 7.6" (1812x2176 pixels) 373 PPI
weight g327253
os version4.2.213
battery mah35004400
release date2014-04-012023-07-01
storage options gb8256, 512, 1024
Launch MSRPPrice on request$1849.99 USD
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 83.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Lenovo A7-30 A3300:
Balanced specifications with Lenovo hardware design · Runs Android 4.2.2 with optimized security support
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5:
Higher overall BeastScore: 83.0 vs top rival 74.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+900 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Lenovo A7-30 A3300 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

Which is better: Lenovo A7-30 A3300 or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 leads with an overall BeastScore of 83.0/100 compared to Lenovo A7-30 A3300 (74.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 83.0 vs top rival 74.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+900 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Lenovo A7-30 A3300 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

Lenovo A7-30 A3300 is equipped with a 7-inch display and 3500 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Lenovo A7-30 A3300 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Lenovo A7-30 A3300 achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 scores 88/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read Analysis →
ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
18 min read

ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive architectural deep dive comparing the ASUS ROG Ally X, Valve Steam Deck OLED, and Lenovo Legion Go across AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs. custom Sephiroth APUs, 80Wh vs 50Wh vs 49.2Wh battery thermals, RDNA 3 compute, SteamOS vs Windows 11 optimization, and real-world frametimes.

Read Analysis →
Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Definitive Wearable Benchmark
14 min read

Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.

Read Analysis →