BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Lenovo LePad S2007 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Lab Benchmark Battle

Lenovo LePad S2007 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Lenovo

Lenovo LePad S2007

Lenovo LePad S2007
73/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
86/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G BETTER THAN Lenovo LePad S2007?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Lenovo LePad S2007
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORLenovo LePadSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity3,780 mAh4,400 mAh+4,400 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size7"7.6"7.6"
Chassis Weight357g271g271g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Lenovo LePad S2007:
  • 7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
  • 86g lighter chassis (271g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • Larger 4,400 mAh battery capacity (+620 mAh more capacity)
  • 7.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationLenovo LePad S2007Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 2.3 (Gingerbread)| planned upgrade to 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)Android 11, up to 4 major upgrades
socQualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
ram gb112
camerasmainmain, selfie
displayIPS LCD capacitive touchscreen 16M colors 7" (800 x 1280 pixels (~216 ppi pixel density)) 216 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) 7.6" (1768x2208 pixels) 372 PPI
weight g357271
os version2.311
battery mah37804400
connectivitygps: Yes with A-GPS, sim: No, usb: microUSB 2.0, wlan: Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n| hotspot, network: HSPA / EVDO, bluetooth: 2.1| A2DP| EDR
release date2011-11-012021-08-01
storage options gb16256, 512
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Lenovo LePad S2007:
Balanced specifications with Lenovo hardware design · Runs Android 2.3 (Gingerbread)| planned upgrade to 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) with optimized security support
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 73.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+620 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Lenovo LePad S2007 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Which is better: Lenovo LePad S2007 or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.0/100 compared to Lenovo LePad S2007 (73.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 73.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+620 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Lenovo LePad S2007 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Lenovo LePad S2007 is equipped with a 7-inch display and 3780 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Lenovo LePad S2007 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Lenovo LePad S2007 achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G scores 88/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read Analysis →
ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
18 min read

ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive architectural deep dive comparing the ASUS ROG Ally X, Valve Steam Deck OLED, and Lenovo Legion Go across AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs. custom Sephiroth APUs, 80Wh vs 50Wh vs 49.2Wh battery thermals, RDNA 3 compute, SteamOS vs Windows 11 optimization, and real-world frametimes.

Read Analysis →
Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Definitive Wearable Benchmark
14 min read

Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.

Read Analysis →