BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/LG Optimus Pad LTE vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Lab Benchmark Battle

LG Optimus Pad LTE vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
LG Electronics

LG Optimus Pad LTE

LG Optimus Pad LTE
85/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
86/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G BETTER THAN LG Optimus Pad LTE?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

LG Optimus Pad LTE
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORLG OptimusSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity6,800 mAh4,400 mAh+6,800 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size8.9"7.6"8.9"
Chassis Weight497g271g271g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy LG Optimus Pad LTE:
  • Larger 6,800 mAh battery capacity (+2,400 mAh more capacity)
  • 8.9" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
  • 226g lighter chassis (271g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 7.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationLG Optimus Pad LTESamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 3.2Android 11, up to 4 major upgrades
socQualcommQualcomm Snapdragon
ram gb3212
camerasmain, selfiemain, selfie
displayIPS LCD 8.9" (768x1280 pixels) 168 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) 7.6" (1768x2208 pixels) 372 PPI
weight g497271
os version3.211
battery mah68004400
release date2012-01-012021-08-01
storage options gb32256, 512
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose LG Optimus Pad LTE:
Larger battery capacity: 6,800 mAh (+2,400 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 8.9" vs max 7.6" for media & multitasking
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 85.0 · Lighter body: 271g (226g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: LG Optimus Pad LTE vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Which is better: LG Optimus Pad LTE or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.0/100 compared to LG Optimus Pad LTE (85.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 85.0 and Lighter body: 271g (226g lighter in hand).

What are the primary battery and display differences between LG Optimus Pad LTE and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

LG Optimus Pad LTE is equipped with a 8.9-inch display and 6800 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between LG Optimus Pad LTE and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

In objective hardware benchmarks, LG Optimus Pad LTE achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G scores 88/100.