LG Watch Sport vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartwatches Battle

Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄

LG Electronics

LG Watch Sport

92/ 100

Launch MSRPPricing on request

Buy on Amazon↗

Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)

92/ 100

Launch MSRP$649 USD

Buy on Amazon↗

WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS LG Watch Sport BETTER THAN Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

LG Watch SportWinner 🏆

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta

SPEC FACTOR	LG Watch	Samsung Galaxy	LEADER
Refresh Rate	60Hz	60Hz	60Hz
Battery Capacity	430 mAh	590 mAh	+590 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	Standard	Standard	25W
Main Camera Sensor	N/A	N/A	48 MP
Screen Display Size	1.38"	1.5"	1.5"
Chassis Weight	150g	605g	150g Lightest

Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄

Reasons to buy LG Watch Sport:

✓455g lighter chassis (150g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
✓1.38" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm):

✓$9350 lower launch MSRP ($649 vs $9999)
✓Larger 590 mAh battery capacity (+160 mAh more capacity)
✓1.5" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄

Specification	LG Watch Sport	Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Smartwatches)
os	Android Wear OS 2.1	Wear OS 5 Powered by Samsung with One UI 6 Watch
soc	0	—
ram gb	0.75	—
cameras	None	—
display	P-OLED 1.38" (480x480 pixels) 492 PPI	1.5-inch Super AMOLED (480x480, 327 PPI), Always-On Display, Sapphire Crystal Glass, up to 3000 nits peak outdoor brightness
weight g	150	—
dimensions	—	47.4 x 47.1 x 12.1 mm
os version	2.1	—
battery mah	430	—
connectivity	—	Standalone 4G LTE cellular eSIM, Dual-frequency GPS (L1+L5), Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n 2.4+5GHz, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC Samsung Pay / Google Wallet
release date	2017-02-01	—
storage options gb	4	—
gps	—	Dual-frequency GPS (L1 + L5) for pinpoint trail and marathon tracking
ram	—	2GB RAM
weight	—	60.5 g (rugged titanium frame)
battery	—	590 mAh capacity (up to 100 hours in Power Saving mode, 48 hours Exercise Power Saving mode)
storage	—	32GB Internal Storage
charging	—	WPC-based wireless fast charging (10W)
materials	—	Aerospace-grade Grade 4 Titanium cushion frame with marine band
processor	—	Samsung Exynos W1000 (3nm, 5-core CPU: 1x Cortex-A78 + 4x Cortex-A55)
durability	—	10 ATM (100m ocean swim/dive) + IP68 + MIL-STD-810H certified, built-in 86dB emergency safety siren
health sensors	—	Samsung BioActive Sensor (Optical Heart Rate + Electrical Heart Signal ECG + Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis BIA), Temperature Sensor, Sleep Apnea, AGEs Index tracking
Launch MSRP	Price on request	$649 USD

Editorial Lab Verdict

LG Watch Sport edges ahead with a BeastScore of 92.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, LG Watch Sport ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose LG Watch Sport:

Lighter body: 150g (455g lighter in hand)

When to choose Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm):

Lower launch price: $649 (save $Infinity)

Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: LG Watch Sport vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)

Which is better: LG Watch Sport or Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?

LG Watch Sport leads with an overall BeastScore of 92.0/100 compared to Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) (92.0/100), driven by advantages in Lighter body: 150g (455g lighter in hand).

What are the primary battery and display differences between LG Watch Sport and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?

LG Watch Sport is equipped with a 1.38-inch display and 430 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) features a 1.5-inch display and 590 mAh battery.