BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/MatePad Pro 5G vs Galaxy A05
Lab Benchmark Battle

MatePad Pro 5G vs Galaxy A05

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Huawei · 2020

MatePad Pro 5G

MatePad Pro 5G
75/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2023

Galaxy A05

Galaxy A05
76/ 100
Launch MSRP$99 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Galaxy A05 BETTER THAN MatePad Pro 5G?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

MatePad Pro 5G
Galaxy A05Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORMatePad ProGalaxy A05LEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity7,250 mAh5,000 mAh+7,250 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandard25W25W
Main Camera Sensor13 MP50 MP50 MP
Screen Display Size10.8"6.7"10.8"
Chassis Weight460g195g195g Lightest
Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy MatePad Pro 5G:
  • ✓Larger 7,250 mAh battery capacity (+2,250 mAh more capacity)
  • ✓13MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓10.8" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Galaxy A05:
  • ✓265g lighter chassis (195g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓$9900 lower launch MSRP ($99 vs $9999)
  • ✓50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationMatePad Pro 5GGalaxy A05
1. Display & Screen🏆 MatePad Pro 5G Wins Display
Screen Type & TechIPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colorsPLS LCD Infinity-V
Screen Size10.8"6.7"
Resolution & Density2560x1600 (280 ppi)1600x720 (263 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz ProMotion60 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/A400 nits peak
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 MatePad Pro 5G Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android 13
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR4 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage6GB / 8GB / 128GB / 256GB / 512GB64GB / 128GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Galaxy A05 Wins Camera
Primary Camera13 MP50 MP, f/1.8
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens8 MP8 MP, f/2
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Galaxy A05 Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A168.8 x 78.2 x 8.8 mm
Weight460 g195 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 MatePad Pro 5G Wins Battery
Battery Capacity7,250 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/A25W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspotWi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE5.3
USB Port & Speed3.1, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB On-The-GoUSB-C 2.0
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on request$99
Editorial Lab Verdict

Galaxy A05 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 75.6/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Galaxy A05 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose MatePad Pro 5G:
Larger battery capacity: 7,250 mAh (+2,250 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 10.8" vs max 6.7" for media & multitasking
When to choose Galaxy A05:
Higher overall BeastScore: 75.6 vs top rival 75.4 · Significantly faster wired charging: 25W vs max 0W
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: MatePad Pro 5G vs Galaxy A05

Which is better: MatePad Pro 5G or Galaxy A05?

Galaxy A05 leads with an overall BeastScore of 75.6/100 compared to MatePad Pro 5G (75.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 75.6 vs top rival 75.4 and Significantly faster wired charging: 25W vs max 0W.

What are the primary battery and display differences between MatePad Pro 5G and Galaxy A05?

MatePad Pro 5G is equipped with a 10.8-inch display and 7250 mAh battery, while Galaxy A05 features a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between MatePad Pro 5G and Galaxy A05?

In objective hardware benchmarks, MatePad Pro 5G achieves a 80/100 performance score, while Galaxy A05 scores 64/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

SM-F926U Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-F926T
Samsung

SM-F926U Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-F926T

iPhone 17e
Apple

iPhone 17e

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GU0NP (Google Rango)
Google

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GU0NP (Google Rango)

OnePlus Ace 3V 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJF110 (BBK Audi)
Oneplus

OnePlus Ace 3V 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJF110 (BBK Audi)

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25053RT47C (Xiaomi Onyx)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25053RT47C (Xiaomi Onyx)

BBK vivo X100 Ultra 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2366GA (BBK V2366)
Vivo

BBK vivo X100 Ultra 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2366GA (BBK V2366)

Oppo Find X8 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2659 (BBK 2659)
Oppo

Oppo Find X8 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2659 (BBK 2659)

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Related Showdowns

More Smartphones Battles

Head-to-Head

MatePad Pro 5G vs SM-F926U Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-F926T

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Galaxy A05 vs SM-F926U Galaxy Z Fold3 5G UW TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-F926T

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

MatePad Pro 5G vs iPhone 17e

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Galaxy A05 vs iPhone 17e

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

MatePad Pro 5G vs Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GU0NP (Google Rango)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Galaxy A05 vs Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GU0NP (Google Rango)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

MatePad Pro 5G vs OnePlus Ace 3V 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJF110 (BBK Audi)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Galaxy A05 vs OnePlus Ace 3V 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJF110 (BBK Audi)

View Battle →
Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbersComparison
6 min read

Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers

A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.

Read Analysis →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read Analysis →
Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs. Apple A18 Pro: The Definitive 3nm Mobile Silicon Architecture, GPU Ray Tracing & Gaming Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship SoC Architecture
22 min read

Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs. Apple A18 Pro: The Definitive 3nm Mobile Silicon Architecture, GPU Ray Tracing & Gaming Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3nm architectural deep dive comparing Qualcomm custom Oryon CPU, MediaTek All-Big-Core Dimensity 9400, and Apple A18 Pro—covering microarchitecture, Adreno 830 vs Immortalis-G925 ray tracing, NPU compute, thermal throttling, and real-world gaming frame rates.

Read Analysis →