MatePad T8 vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
MatePad T8
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
WHY IS MatePad T8 BETTER THAN Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | MatePad T8 | Samsung SM-G736U1 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 5,100 mAh | 4,050 mAh | +5,100 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 5 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 8" | 6.58" | 8" |
| Chassis Weight | 310g | 240g | 240g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄MatePad T8 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 66.4/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, MatePad T8 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: MatePad T8 vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Which is better: MatePad T8 or Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?
MatePad T8 leads with an overall BeastScore of 66.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) (66.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 66.4 vs top rival 66.2 and Larger battery capacity: 5,100 mAh (+1,050 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between MatePad T8 and Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?
MatePad T8 is equipped with a 8-inch display and 5100 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) features a 6.58-inch display and 4050 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between MatePad T8 and Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, MatePad T8 achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) scores 72/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB
A17k
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
More Smartphones Battles
MatePad T8 vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
MatePad T8 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
MatePad T8 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
MatePad T8 vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Unique GadgetsTop 3 Super Unique Amazon Gadgets You Need to See in 2026 (Tested on YouTube)
We tested 3 viral Amazon gadgets featured on YouTube that look unusual but deliver remarkable utility: an identity theft privacy roller stamp with built-in box opener, 90-degree prism lazy glasses for reading flat in bed, and a precision 3D printing pen for custom DIY accessories.
Viral Life HacksTop 8 Viral Amazon Gadgets That Make Life 10x Easier in 2026 (Tested on YouTube)
We tested 8 viral Amazon gadgets featured on YouTube that solve everyday headaches. From auto-shutoff safety outlet timers and self-warming ice cream scoops to briefcase smart TVs and magnetic travel capsules, see our complete breakdown and verified buying options.