BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/MediaPad M3 Lite 8 vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Lab Benchmark Battle

MediaPad M3 Lite 8 vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Huawei · 2017

MediaPad M3 Lite 8

MediaPad M3 Lite 8
66/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2022

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
66/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) BETTER THAN MediaPad M3 Lite 8?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

MediaPad M3 Lite 8
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORMediaPad M3Samsung SM-G736U1LEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity4,800 mAh4,050 mAh+4,800 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera Sensor8 MPN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size8"6.58"8"
Chassis Weight310g240g240g Lightest
Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy MediaPad M3 Lite 8:
  • ✓Larger 4,800 mAh battery capacity (+750 mAh more capacity)
  • ✓8MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓8" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736):
  • ✓70g lighter chassis (240g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓6.58" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationMediaPad M3 Lite 8Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
1. Display & Screen🏆 MediaPad M3 Lite 8 Wins Display
Screen Type & TechS-IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colorsColor PLS TFT LCD display
Screen Size8"6.58"
Resolution & Density1200x1920 (283 ppi)1080x2408 (401 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz ProMotion60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory4 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage3GB / 4GB / 32GB / 64GB128GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 MediaPad M3 Lite 8 Wins Camera
Primary Camera8 MPN/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens8 MPN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight310 g240 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 MediaPad M3 Lite 8 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,800 mAh4,050 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, hotspotWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth4.0, A2DPBluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedmicroUSB 2.0, USB On-The-GoUSB Type-C
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 66.2/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose MediaPad M3 Lite 8:
Larger battery capacity: 4,800 mAh (+750 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 8" vs max 6.58" for media & multitasking
When to choose Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736):
Higher overall BeastScore: 66.2 vs top rival 65.8 · More system memory: 6GB RAM vs max 4GB
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: MediaPad M3 Lite 8 vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)

Which is better: MediaPad M3 Lite 8 or Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) leads with an overall BeastScore of 66.2/100 compared to MediaPad M3 Lite 8 (65.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 66.2 vs top rival 65.8 and More system memory: 6GB RAM vs max 4GB.

What are the primary battery and display differences between MediaPad M3 Lite 8 and Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?

MediaPad M3 Lite 8 is equipped with a 8-inch display and 4800 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) features a 6.58-inch display and 4050 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between MediaPad M3 Lite 8 and Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?

In objective hardware benchmarks, MediaPad M3 Lite 8 achieves a 64/100 performance score, while Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) scores 72/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Samsung

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Apple

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Google

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB

A17k
Oppo

A17k

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Related Showdowns

More Smartphones Battles

Head-to-Head

MediaPad M3 Lite 8 vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

MediaPad M3 Lite 8 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

MediaPad M3 Lite 8 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

MediaPad M3 Lite 8 vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 9400 vs Apple A18 Pro: The Real WinnerDeep Dive
9 min read

Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 9400 vs Apple A18 Pro: The Real Winner

We compared the big three 3nm smartphone chipsets under sustained 60-minute gaming loads, measuring frame rate stability, power draw, and thermal throttling.

Read Analysis →
Qualcomm outlines the improvements in the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro's new NPUChipset
5 min read

Qualcomm outlines the improvements in the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro's new NPU

Qualcomm has outlined the architectural upgrades inside the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro, featuring a 45% faster Hexagon NPU with 28% lower sustained power draw for generative AI.

Read Analysis →
Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs. Apple A18 Pro: The Definitive 3nm Mobile Silicon Architecture, GPU Ray Tracing & Gaming Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship SoC Architecture
22 min read

Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs. Apple A18 Pro: The Definitive 3nm Mobile Silicon Architecture, GPU Ray Tracing & Gaming Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3nm architectural deep dive comparing Qualcomm custom Oryon CPU, MediaTek All-Big-Core Dimensity 9400, and Apple A18 Pro—covering microarchitecture, Adreno 830 vs Immortalis-G925 ray tracing, NPU compute, thermal throttling, and real-world gaming frame rates.

Read Analysis →