BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Memo Pad 10 ME103K vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Lab Benchmark Battle

Memo Pad 10 ME103K vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Asus · 2014

Memo Pad 10 ME103K

Memo Pad 10 ME103K
66/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2025

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
66/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Memo Pad 10 ME103K BETTER THAN Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Memo Pad 10 ME103KWinner 🏆
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORMemo PadSamsung SM-G766NLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh4,350 mAh+5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera Sensor5 MPN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size10.1"6.58"10.1"
Chassis Weight150g240g150g Lightest
Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Memo Pad 10 ME103K:
  • ✓90g lighter chassis (150g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓Larger 5,000 mAh battery capacity (+650 mAh more capacity)
  • ✓5MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
Reasons to buy Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766):
  • ✓6.58" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationMemo Pad 10 ME103KSamsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
1. Display & Screen🏆 Memo Pad 10 ME103K Wins Display
Screen Type & TechIPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colorsColor PLS TFT LCD display
Screen Size10.1"6.58"
Resolution & Density800x1280 (149 ppi)1080x2408 (401 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz ProMotion60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory1 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage1GB / 32GB128GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Memo Pad 10 ME103K Wins Camera
Primary Camera5 MPN/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/AN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Memo Pad 10 ME103K Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight150 g240 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Memo Pad 10 ME103K Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh4,350 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/nWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth4.0, A2DPBluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedmicroUSB 2.0USB Type-C
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Memo Pad 10 ME103K edges ahead with a BeastScore of 66.4/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Memo Pad 10 ME103K ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Memo Pad 10 ME103K:
Higher overall BeastScore: 66.4 vs top rival 66.2 · Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+650 mAh more)
When to choose Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766):
More system memory: 6GB RAM vs max 1GB
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Memo Pad 10 ME103K vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

Which is better: Memo Pad 10 ME103K or Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?

Memo Pad 10 ME103K leads with an overall BeastScore of 66.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) (66.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 66.4 vs top rival 66.2 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+650 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Memo Pad 10 ME103K and Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?

Memo Pad 10 ME103K is equipped with a 10.1-inch display and 5000 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) features a 6.58-inch display and 4350 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Memo Pad 10 ME103K and Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Memo Pad 10 ME103K achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) scores 72/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Samsung

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Apple

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Google

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB

A17k
Oppo

A17k

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Related Showdowns

More Smartphones Battles

Head-to-Head

Memo Pad 10 ME103K vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Memo Pad 10 ME103K vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Memo Pad 10 ME103K vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Memo Pad 10 ME103K vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 "Strix Halo" Deep Dive: 16 Zen 5 Cores, 40-CU RDNA 3.5, 128GB Unified Memory, and Local LLM ArchitectureHARDWARE DEEP DIVE
14 min read

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 "Strix Halo" Deep Dive: 16 Zen 5 Cores, 40-CU RDNA 3.5, 128GB Unified Memory, and Local LLM Architecture

A complete architectural breakdown of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (Strix Halo): 16 full Zen 5 cores, Radeon 8060S with 40 RDNA 3.5 compute units, 128GB unified LPDDR5X-8533 memory, 32MB MALL cache, and local AI benchmarks.

Read Analysis →
Apple M4 Max & M4 Pro Silicon Deep Dive: 3nm Architecture, 128GB Unified Memory, Thunderbolt 5, and Benchmark BreakdownSilicon Deep Dive
14 min read

Apple M4 Max & M4 Pro Silicon Deep Dive: 3nm Architecture, 128GB Unified Memory, Thunderbolt 5, and Benchmark Breakdown

An architectural deep dive into Apple's M4 Pro and M4 Max silicon: 2nd-gen 3nm lithography, 546 GB/s memory bandwidth, 2x ray-tracing throughput, Thunderbolt 5, and real-world benchmarks across LLMs, 3D rendering, and video production.

Read Analysis →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read Analysis →