Memo Pad 7 ME572C vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) BETTER THAN Memo Pad 7 ME572C?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Memo Pad | OnePlus Nord | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 3,950 mAh | 5,000 mAh | +5,000 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 5 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 7" | 6.56" | 7" |
| Chassis Weight | 269g | 190g | 190g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 67.4/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Memo Pad 7 ME572C vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Which is better: Memo Pad 7 ME572C or OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)?
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) leads with an overall BeastScore of 67.4/100 compared to Memo Pad 7 ME572C (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 67.4 vs top rival 60.8 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,050 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Memo Pad 7 ME572C and OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)?
Memo Pad 7 ME572C is equipped with a 7-inch display and 3950 mAh battery, while OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) features a 6.56-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Memo Pad 7 ME572C and OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Memo Pad 7 ME572C achieves a 60/100 performance score, while OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) scores 64/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung SM-A253C Galaxy A25 5G 2025 TD-LTE JP 64GB (Samsung A253)

Apple iPhone 16e 5G A3408 Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA CA MX 128GB (Apple iPhone 17,5)
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)

OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)

Xiaomi Redmi 14C 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2411DRN47G (Xiaomi Flame Blaze)

BBK Vivo Y56 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB V2225 (BBK V2225)

Oppo A60 5G 2024 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB CPH2683 / A3 (BBK 2683)

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
More Smartphones Battles
Memo Pad 7 ME572C vs Galaxy Folder2
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) vs Samsung SM-A253C Galaxy A25 5G 2025 TD-LTE JP 64GB (Samsung A253)
Memo Pad 7 ME572C vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) vs Apple iPhone 16e 5G A3408 Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA CA MX 128GB (Apple iPhone 17,5)
Memo Pad 7 ME572C vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
Memo Pad 7 ME572C vs OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) vs OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
HARDWARE DEEP DIVEAMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 "Strix Halo" Deep Dive: 16 Zen 5 Cores, 40-CU RDNA 3.5, 128GB Unified Memory, and Local LLM Architecture
A complete architectural breakdown of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (Strix Halo): 16 full Zen 5 cores, Radeon 8060S with 40 RDNA 3.5 compute units, 128GB unified LPDDR5X-8533 memory, 32MB MALL cache, and local AI benchmarks.
Apple M4 Max & M4 Pro Silicon Deep Dive: 3nm Architecture, 128GB Unified Memory, Thunderbolt 5, and Benchmark Breakdown
An architectural deep dive into Apple's M4 Pro and M4 Max silicon: 2nd-gen 3nm lithography, 546 GB/s memory bandwidth, 2x ray-tracing throughput, Thunderbolt 5, and real-world benchmarks across LLMs, 3D rendering, and video production.
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

