BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Micromax Funbook Pro vs Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB
Lab Benchmark Battle

Micromax Funbook Pro vs Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Micromax

Micromax Funbook Pro

Micromax Funbook Pro
73/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Xiaomi

Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB

Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB
84/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB BETTER THAN Micromax Funbook Pro?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Micromax Funbook Pro
Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GBWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORMicromax FunbookMi MixLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity5,600 mAh5,020 mAh+5,600 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size10.1"8.01"10.1"
Chassis Weight150g317g150g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Micromax Funbook Pro:
  • 167g lighter chassis (150g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • Larger 5,600 mAh battery capacity (+580 mAh more capacity)
  • 10.1" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB:
  • 8.01" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationMicromax Funbook ProMi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 4.0.3Google Android 11 (R)
soc1.2 GHz Cortex-A8Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G SM8350
ram gb112
camerasmainmain, selfie
displayTFT 10.1" (600x1024 pixels) 118 PPIAM-OLED display 8.01" (1860x2480) 387 PPI
weight g150317
os version4.0.311
battery mah56005020
connectivitybluetooth: Bluetooth 5.2
release date2012-08-012021-04-16
storage options gb8512
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Micromax Funbook Pro:
Larger battery capacity: 5,600 mAh (+580 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 10.1" vs max 8.01" for media & multitasking
When to choose Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB:
Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 73.0
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Micromax Funbook Pro vs Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB

Which is better: Micromax Funbook Pro or Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB?

Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB leads with an overall BeastScore of 84.0/100 compared to Micromax Funbook Pro (73.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 73.0.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Micromax Funbook Pro and Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB?

Micromax Funbook Pro is equipped with a 10.1-inch display and 5600 mAh battery, while Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB features a 8.01-inch display and 5020 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Micromax Funbook Pro and Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Micromax Funbook Pro achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB scores 88/100.