BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Micromax Funbook Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Fold
Lab Benchmark Battle

Micromax Funbook Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Micromax

Micromax Funbook Pro

Micromax Funbook Pro
73/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Fold

Samsung Galaxy Fold
84/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Fold BETTER THAN Micromax Funbook Pro?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Micromax Funbook Pro
Samsung Galaxy FoldWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORMicromax FunbookSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity5,600 mAh4,380 mAh+5,600 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size10.1"7.3"10.1"
Chassis Weight150g276g150g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Micromax Funbook Pro:
  • 126g lighter chassis (150g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • Larger 5,600 mAh battery capacity (+1,220 mAh more capacity)
  • 10.1" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Fold:
  • 7.3" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationMicromax Funbook ProSamsung Galaxy Fold
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 4.0.3Android 9.0, up to Android 12, One UI 4
soc1.2 GHz Cortex-A8Snapdragon 855
ram gb112
camerasmainmain
displayTFT 10.1" (600x1024 pixels) 118 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ 7.3" (1536x2152 pixels) 362 PPI
weight g150276
os version4.0.39.0
battery mah56004380
release date2012-08-012019-02-01
storage options gb8512
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Fold edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Fold ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Micromax Funbook Pro:
Larger battery capacity: 5,600 mAh (+1,220 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 10.1" vs max 7.3" for media & multitasking
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Fold:
Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 73.0
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Micromax Funbook Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

Which is better: Micromax Funbook Pro or Samsung Galaxy Fold?

Samsung Galaxy Fold leads with an overall BeastScore of 84.0/100 compared to Micromax Funbook Pro (73.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 73.0.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Micromax Funbook Pro and Samsung Galaxy Fold?

Micromax Funbook Pro is equipped with a 10.1-inch display and 5600 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Fold features a 7.3-inch display and 4380 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Micromax Funbook Pro and Samsung Galaxy Fold?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Micromax Funbook Pro achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Fold scores 88/100.