Motorola XOOM 2 3G MZ616 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G BETTER THAN Motorola XOOM 2 3G MZ616?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Motorola XOOM | Samsung Galaxy | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 7,000 mAh | 4,400 mAh | +7,000 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 10.1" | 7.6" | 10.1" |
| Chassis Weight | 599g | 271g | 271g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.0/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Motorola XOOM 2 3G MZ616 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Which is better: Motorola XOOM 2 3G MZ616 or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.0/100 compared to Motorola XOOM 2 3G MZ616 (72.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 72.0 and Lighter body: 271g (328g lighter in hand).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Motorola XOOM 2 3G MZ616 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?
Motorola XOOM 2 3G MZ616 is equipped with a 10.1-inch display and 7000 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Motorola XOOM 2 3G MZ616 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Motorola XOOM 2 3G MZ616 achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G scores 88/100.
Related Tablets & iPads (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Find N 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PEUM00
Find N 2021 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PEUM00
Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB
Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
More Tablets & iPads Battles
Motorola XOOM 2 3G MZ616 vs Find N 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PEUM00
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special
Motorola XOOM 2 3G MZ616 vs Find N 2021 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PEUM00
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G vs Apple iPad Air 11 5G (2026)
Motorola XOOM 2 3G MZ616 vs Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G vs Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Motorola XOOM 2 3G MZ616 vs Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G vs OnePlus Turbo 6X Pro 5G
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
TeaserMotorola starts teasing its own wide foldable smartphone in response to the iPhone Duo
Motorola has published official teaser sketches of an upcoming wide-format book-style foldable aimed at competing directly with the iPhone Duo and Galaxy Fold.
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.