BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Oppo Watch SE vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
Lab Benchmark Battle

Oppo Watch SE vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartwatches Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
OPPO

Oppo Watch SE

Oppo Watch SE
92/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
92/ 100
Launch MSRP$649 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Oppo Watch SE BETTER THAN Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Oppo Watch SEWinner 🏆
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTOROppo WatchSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery CapacityN/A590 mAh+590 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display SizeN/A1.5"6.1"
Chassis WeightN/AN/A999g

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Oppo Watch SE:

Comprehensive flagship hardware with verified benchmark scores.

Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm):
  • $9350 lower launch MSRP ($649 vs $9999)
  • Larger 590 mAh battery capacity (+590 mAh more capacity)
  • 1.5" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationOppo Watch SESamsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Smartwatches)
osColorOS Watch 3.0 - China
soc[object Object]
nameOppo Watch SE
slugoppo-watch-se-aitoolbuzz-7804-1gb-8gb-4g-lte
brand[object Object]
images
ram gb1
cameras[object Object]
display[object Object]1.5-inch Super AMOLED (480x480, Sapphire Crystal), up to 3000 nits peak outdoor brightness
verified
weight g31
image urlhttps://aitoolbuzz.com/assets/agents/mobiles/oppo-watch-se.jpg
dimensions[object Object]
os version3.0
battery mah400
connectivity[object Object]
release date2023-08-01
base model slugwatch-se
storage options gb8
gpsDual-frequency GPS (L1 + L5) for pinpoint trail and marathon tracking
battery590 mAh (up to 100 hours in Power Saving mode, 48 hours Exercise mode)
materialsAerospace-grade Grade 4 Titanium cushion frame
processor3nm Exynos W1000 (Penta-core)
durability10 ATM + IP68 water resistance + MIL-STD-810H, built-in 86dB emergency siren
Launch MSRPPrice on request$649 USD
Editorial Lab Verdict

Oppo Watch SE edges ahead with a BeastScore of 92.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Oppo Watch SE ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Oppo Watch SE:
Balanced specifications with OPPO hardware design · Runs ColorOS Watch 3.0 - China with optimized security support
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm):
Larger battery capacity: 590 mAh (+590 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 1.5" vs max 0" for media & multitasking
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Oppo Watch SE vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)

Which is better: Oppo Watch SE or Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?

Oppo Watch SE leads with an overall BeastScore of 92.0/100 compared to Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) (92.0/100), driven by advantages in Balanced specifications with OPPO hardware design and Runs ColorOS Watch 3.0 - China with optimized security support.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Oppo Watch SE and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?

Oppo Watch SE is equipped with a display and standard battery, while Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) features a 1.5-inch display and 590 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Oppo Watch SE and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Oppo Watch SE achieves a 94/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) scores 94/100.