P6200 Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus vs Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS P6200 Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus BETTER THAN Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | P6200 Galaxy | Xiaomi Mi4 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 3,080 mAh | +4,000 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 3.15 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 7" | 5" | 7" |
| Chassis Weight | 345g | 149g | 149g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄P6200 Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus edges ahead with a BeastScore of 63.2/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, P6200 Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: P6200 Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus vs Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Which is better: P6200 Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus or Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
P6200 Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus leads with an overall BeastScore of 63.2/100 compared to Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 63.2 vs top rival 60.8 and Larger battery capacity: 4,000 mAh (+920 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between P6200 Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus and Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
P6200 Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus is equipped with a 7-inch display and 4000 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) features a 5-inch display and 3080 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between P6200 Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus and Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, P6200 Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) scores 60/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Galaxy Folder2

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Hongmi / Redmi 2013022 (Xiaomi Red Rice)

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE

Oppo A55s 2022 5G TD-LTE JP 64GB A102OP (BBK 2309)

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
More Smartphones Battles
P6200 Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus vs Galaxy Folder2
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Galaxy Folder2
P6200 Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
P6200 Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
P6200 Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
