P6800 Galaxy Tab 7.7 vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
P6800 Galaxy Tab 7.7
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
WHY IS P6800 Galaxy Tab 7.7 BETTER THAN Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | P6800 Galaxy | Samsung SM-G766N | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 5,100 mAh | 4,350 mAh | +5,100 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 3.15 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 7.7" | 6.58" | 7.7" |
| Chassis Weight | 340g | 240g | 240g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄P6800 Galaxy Tab 7.7 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 66.4/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, P6800 Galaxy Tab 7.7 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: P6800 Galaxy Tab 7.7 vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Which is better: P6800 Galaxy Tab 7.7 or Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?
P6800 Galaxy Tab 7.7 leads with an overall BeastScore of 66.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) (66.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 66.4 vs top rival 66.2 and Larger battery capacity: 5,100 mAh (+750 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between P6800 Galaxy Tab 7.7 and Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?
P6800 Galaxy Tab 7.7 is equipped with a 7.7-inch display and 5100 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) features a 6.58-inch display and 4350 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between P6800 Galaxy Tab 7.7 and Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, P6800 Galaxy Tab 7.7 achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) scores 72/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB
A17k
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
More Smartphones Battles
P6800 Galaxy Tab 7.7 vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
P6800 Galaxy Tab 7.7 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
P6800 Galaxy Tab 7.7 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
P6800 Galaxy Tab 7.7 vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.