BeastCompare

Pixel XL vs Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE: Which One Should You Buy?

Pixel XL edges ahead with a BeastScore of 63.8/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Google · 2016

Pixel XL

Pixel XL
64/ 100
Launch price$769
Samsung · 2015

Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE

Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE
61/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Pixel XL wins 2 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Pixel XL
Pixel XL
2 wins
Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE
Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Pixel XLSamsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedPixel XL
    64
    60
  • CameraPixel XL
    68
    60
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryTie
    58
    58
  • DisplayTie
    62
    62
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    68
    68
Key differences
  • Pixel XL has the bigger battery3,450 mAh vs 1,800 mAh
  • Pixel XL has the bigger screen5.5" vs 3.8"
  • Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE is lighter155 g vs 168 g
  • Pixel XL has more RAM4 GB vs 2 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Pixel XL
  • ✓Bigger 3,450 mAh battery (+1,650 mAh)
  • ✓12.3 MP main camera
  • ✓5.5" display at 60 Hz
Reasons to buy Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE
  • ✓13 g lighter (155 g vs 168 g), easier to hold
  • ✓3.8" display

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationPixel XLSamsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeAMOLEDColor TN-TFT LCD display
Screen Size5.5"3.8"
Resolution & Density2560x1440 (534 ppi)480x800 (245 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 HzNot listed
Brightness400 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Pixel XL Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorNot listed Not listed
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 7.1Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory4 GB LPDDR2 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage32GB / 128GB8GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Pixel XL Wins Camera
Primary Camera12.3 MP, f/2N/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)Not listed
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNot listed
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens8 MP, f/2.4N/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE Lightest Chassis
Dimensions154.7 x 75.7 x 8.5 mmN/A
Weight168 g155 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP53Not listed
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity3,450 mAh1,800 mAh
Wired Fast Charging18W wired fast chargingN/A
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 5Not listed
Bluetooth4.2Not listed
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.1Not listed
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$769Price on request
Our verdict

Pixel XL wins — BeastScore 63.8/100

The Pixel XL is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (3,450 mAh vs 1,800 mAh) and bigger screen (5.5" vs 3.8"). The Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE is worth a look if you prefer its lighter body (155 g vs 168 g).

Buy Pixel XL if you want

Larger battery: 3,450 mAh vs 1,800 mAh · Larger display: 5.5" vs 3.8"

Buy Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE if you want

Lighter: 155 g vs 168 g (13 g less)

Common questions

Which is better: Pixel XL or Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE?

The Pixel XL is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (3,450 mAh vs 1,800 mAh) and bigger screen (5.5" vs 3.8"). The Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE is worth a look if you prefer its lighter body (155 g vs 168 g). BeastScore: Pixel XL 63.8/100, Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE 60.8/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Pixel XL and Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE?

Pixel XL has a 5.5-inch display and 3450 mAh battery. Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE has a 3.8-inch display and 1800 mAh battery.

How do Pixel XL and Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE compare for speed?

Pixel XL scores 64/100 for performance; Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE scores 60/100.

Similar Smartphones

Galaxy S6
Samsung

Galaxy S6

iPhone 11 Pro
Apple

iPhone 11 Pro

Pixel
Google

Pixel

OnePlus One
Oneplus

OnePlus One

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB

Oppo A55s 2022 5G TD-LTE JP 64GB A102OP (BBK 2309)
Oppo

Oppo A55s 2022 5G TD-LTE JP 64GB A102OP (BBK 2309)

Motorola Razr (2019)
Motorola

Motorola Razr (2019)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Pixel XL vs Galaxy S6

Compare →
vs

Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE vs Galaxy Folder2

Compare →
vs

Pixel XL vs iPhone 11 Pro

Compare →
vs

Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE vs iPhone 6

Compare →
vs

Pixel XL vs Pixel

Compare →
vs

Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE vs Pixel

Compare →
vs

Pixel XL vs OnePlus One

Compare →
vs

Samsung SM-G150NK Galaxy Folder LTE vs OnePlus One

Compare →

Gear for the Pixel XL

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsApple Watch vs Galaxy Watch vs Pixel WatchThe right watch for your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?Tech News
6 min read

Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?

Google quietly raised the Pixel 10a from $499 to $599 in early October, and Samsung pushed the Galaxy A57 up to $599.99 the same week. That puts three "budget" phones at the same $599 starting price as the iPhone 17e. Here is what changed, how the three compare, and which one makes sense now.

Read →