BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Plum Link II vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Lab Benchmark Battle

Plum Link II vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Plum

Plum Link II

Plum Link II
71/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
86/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G BETTER THAN Plum Link II?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Plum Link II
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORPlum LinkSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity3,000 mAh4,400 mAh+4,400 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size7"7.6"7.6"
Chassis Weight310g271g271g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Plum Link II:
  • 7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
  • 39g lighter chassis (271g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • Larger 4,400 mAh battery capacity (+1,400 mAh more capacity)
  • 7.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationPlum Link IISamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)Android 11, up to 4 major upgrades
ram gb112
camerasmainmain, selfie
displayTFT capacitive touchscreen 7" (600 x 1024 pixels (~170 ppi pixel density)) 170 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) 7.6" (1768x2208 pixels) 372 PPI
weight g310271
os version4.2.211
battery mah30004400
connectivitygps: No, sim: No, usb: microUSB, wlan: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n| dual-band, network: No cellular connectivity, bluetooth: No
release date2013-01-012021-08-01
storage options gb8256, 512
socQualcomm Snapdragon
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Plum Link II:
Balanced specifications with Plum hardware design · Runs Android 4.2.2 (Jelly Bean) with optimized security support
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 71.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+1,400 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Plum Link II vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Which is better: Plum Link II or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.0/100 compared to Plum Link II (71.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 71.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+1,400 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Plum Link II and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Plum Link II is equipped with a 7-inch display and 3000 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Plum Link II and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Plum Link II achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G scores 88/100.