BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Samsung Gear Live vs Allview Allwatch
Lab Benchmark Battle

Samsung Gear Live vs Allview Allwatch

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartwatches Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Samsung

Samsung Gear Live

Samsung Gear Live
70/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Allview

Allview Allwatch

Allview Allwatch
74/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Allview Allwatch BETTER THAN Samsung Gear Live?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Samsung Gear Live
Allview AllwatchWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORSamsung GearAllview AllwatchLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity300 mAh100 mAh+300 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display SizeN/A1.28"6.1"
Chassis Weight59g40g40g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Samsung Gear Live:
  • Larger 300 mAh battery capacity (+200 mAh more capacity)
Reasons to buy Allview Allwatch:
  • 19g lighter chassis (40g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 1.28" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationSamsung Gear LiveAllview Allwatch
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Smartwatches)
osAndroid Wear OSProprietary OS
socQualcomm MSM8226 Snapdragon 400Allview mobile platform 2016
ram gb0.51
camerasNone
displaySuper AMOLED (320 x 320 pixels (~278 ppi density))Monochrome 1.28" (128x128 pixels) 141 PPI
weight g5940
battery mah300100
connectivitynfc: No, usb: No, wlan: No, bluetooth: 4.0, LE
release date2014-06-012016-11-01
storage options gb4
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Allview Allwatch edges ahead with a BeastScore of 74.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Allview Allwatch ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Samsung Gear Live:
Larger battery capacity: 300 mAh (+200 mAh more)
When to choose Allview Allwatch:
Higher overall BeastScore: 74.0 vs top rival 70.0 · Significantly larger display: 1.28" vs max 0" for media & multitasking
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Samsung Gear Live vs Allview Allwatch

Which is better: Samsung Gear Live or Allview Allwatch?

Allview Allwatch leads with an overall BeastScore of 74.0/100 compared to Samsung Gear Live (70.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 74.0 vs top rival 70.0 and Significantly larger display: 1.28" vs max 0" for media & multitasking.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Samsung Gear Live and Allview Allwatch?

Samsung Gear Live is equipped with a display and 300 mAh battery, while Allview Allwatch features a 1.28-inch display and 100 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Samsung Gear Live and Allview Allwatch?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Samsung Gear Live achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Allview Allwatch scores 88/100.