BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) vs BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE
Lab Benchmark Battle

Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) vs BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Samsung · 2016

Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R)

Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R)
61/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Vivo · 2015

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE
61/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) BETTER THAN BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R)Winner 🏆
BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORSamsung SM-T116IRBBK VivoLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity1,500 mAh1,500 mAh1,500 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size7.01"5.5"7.01"
Chassis Weight327g169g169g Lightest
Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R):
  • ✓7.01" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE:
  • ✓158g lighter chassis (169g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓5.5" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationSamsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R)BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE
1. Display & Screen🏆 Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) Wins Display
Screen Type & TechColor TN-TFT LCD displayColor TN-TFT LCD display
Screen Size7.01"5.5"
Resolution & Density600x1024 (169 ppi)720x1280 (267 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz ProMotion60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory2 GB LPDDR2 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage8GB16GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) Wins Camera
Primary CameraN/AN/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/AN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight327 g169 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity1,500 mAh1,500 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-bandWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3+Bluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R):
Significantly larger display: 7.01" vs max 5.5" for media & multitasking
When to choose BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE:
Lighter body: 169g (158g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) vs BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE

Which is better: Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) or BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE?

Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) leads with an overall BeastScore of 60.8/100 compared to BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Significantly larger display: 7.01" vs max 5.5" for media & multitasking.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) and BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE?

Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) is equipped with a 7.01-inch display and 1500 mAh battery, while BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE features a 5.5-inch display and 1500 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) and BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) achieves a 60/100 performance score, while BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE scores 60/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Galaxy Folder2
Samsung

Galaxy Folder2

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Apple

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Google

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)

Y31
Vivo

Y31

Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m
Oppo

Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Related Showdowns

More Smartphones Battles

Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) vs Galaxy Folder2

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE vs Galaxy Folder2

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbersComparison
6 min read

Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers

A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.

Read Analysis →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read Analysis →
Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Definitive Wearable Benchmark
14 min read

Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.

Read Analysis →