Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) vs Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS Motorola Edge 60 Pro BETTER THAN Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Samsung SM-T116IR | Motorola Edge | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 1,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh | +6,000 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | 90W | 90W Max |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 7.01" | 6.7" | 7.01" |
| Chassis Weight | 327g | 186g | 186g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Motorola Edge 60 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.6/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Motorola Edge 60 Pro ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) vs Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Which is better: Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) or Motorola Edge 60 Pro?
Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads with an overall BeastScore of 89.6/100 compared to Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 89.6 vs top rival 60.8 and Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+4,500 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) and Motorola Edge 60 Pro?
Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) is equipped with a 7.01-inch display and 1500 mAh battery, while Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a 6.7-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) and Motorola Edge 60 Pro?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Motorola Edge 60 Pro scores 90/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
More Smartphones Battles
Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) vs Galaxy Folder2
Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs Apple iPhone Duo
Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs Pixel 7 Pro
Samsung SM-T116IR Galaxy Tab Iris 3G (Samsung T116R) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs OnePlus Pad 3 Pro
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.







