BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE vs Galaxy Folder2
Lab Benchmark Battle

Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE vs Galaxy Folder2

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Samsung · 2016

Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE

Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE
61/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2017

Galaxy Folder2

Galaxy Folder2
61/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE BETTER THAN Galaxy Folder2?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTEWinner 🏆
Galaxy Folder2

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORSamsung SM-T285MGalaxy Folder2LEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity1,500 mAh1,950 mAh+1,950 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/A8 MP48 MP
Screen Display Size7"3.8"7"
Chassis Weight283g165g165g Lightest
Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE:
  • ✓7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Galaxy Folder2:
  • ✓118g lighter chassis (165g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓Larger 1,950 mAh battery capacity (+450 mAh more capacity)
  • ✓8MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationSamsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTEGalaxy Folder2
1. Display & Screen🏆 Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE Wins Display
Screen Type & TechColor TN-TFT LCD displayTFT capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
Screen Size7"3.8"
Resolution & Density800x1280 (216 ppi)480x800 (246 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz ProMotion60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory2 GB LPDDR2 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage8GB2GB / 16GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE Wins Camera
Primary CameraN/A8 MP
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/A5 MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Galaxy Folder2 Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight283 g165 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE Wins Battery
Battery Capacity1,500 mAh1,950 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-bandWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, WiFi Direct, hotspot
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3+4.2, A2DP, LE
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-CmicroUSB 2.0
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE:
Significantly larger display: 7" vs max 3.8" for media & multitasking
When to choose Galaxy Folder2:
Larger battery capacity: 1,950 mAh (+450 mAh more) · Lighter body: 165g (118g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE vs Galaxy Folder2

Which is better: Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE or Galaxy Folder2?

Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE leads with an overall BeastScore of 60.8/100 compared to Galaxy Folder2 (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Significantly larger display: 7" vs max 3.8" for media & multitasking.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE and Galaxy Folder2?

Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE is equipped with a 7-inch display and 1500 mAh battery, while Galaxy Folder2 features a 3.8-inch display and 1950 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE and Galaxy Folder2?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Galaxy Folder2 scores 60/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Samsung

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Apple

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Google

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE

Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m
Oppo

Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Related Showdowns

More Smartphones Battles

Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Galaxy Folder2 vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Galaxy Folder2 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Galaxy Folder2 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-T285M Galaxy Tab E 7.0 2016 4G LTE vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Galaxy Folder2 vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbersComparison
6 min read

Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers

A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.

Read Analysis →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read Analysis →
Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Definitive Wearable Benchmark
14 min read

Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.

Read Analysis →