BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Lab Benchmark Battle

Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Sharp · 2011

Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet

Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet
61/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2016

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
61/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet BETTER THAN Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media TabletWinner 🏆
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORSharp EB-W51GJ-RSamsung SM-G1600LEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity1,500 mAh1,950 mAh+1,950 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size5.51"3.8"5.51"
Chassis Weight150g160g150g Lightest
Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet:
  • ✓10g lighter chassis (150g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓5.51" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160):
  • ✓Larger 1,950 mAh battery capacity (+450 mAh more capacity)
  • ✓3.8" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationSharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media TabletSamsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
1. Display & Screen🏆 Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet Wins Display
Screen Type & TechColor ASV TFT LCD displayColor TN-TFT LCD display
Screen Size5.51"3.8"
Resolution & Density1024x600 (215 ppi)480x800 (245 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz ProMotion60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory1 GB LPDDR2 GB LPDDR
Internal StorageN/A16GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet Wins Camera
Primary CameraN/AN/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/AN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight150 g160 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet Wins Battery
Battery Capacity1,500 mAh1,950 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-bandWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3+Bluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet:
Significantly larger display: 5.51" vs max 3.8" for media & multitasking · Lighter body: 150g (10g lighter in hand)
When to choose Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160):
Larger battery capacity: 1,950 mAh (+450 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Which is better: Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet or Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet leads with an overall BeastScore of 60.8/100 compared to Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Significantly larger display: 5.51" vs max 3.8" for media & multitasking and Lighter body: 150g (10g lighter in hand).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet is equipped with a 5.51-inch display and 1500 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) features a 3.8-inch display and 1950 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) scores 60/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Galaxy Folder2
Samsung

Galaxy Folder2

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Apple

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Google

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE

Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m
Oppo

Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Related Showdowns

More Smartphones Battles

Head-to-Head

Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet vs Galaxy Folder2

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Galaxy Folder2

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Sharp EB-W51GJ-R Galapagos 5.5 Media Tablet vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 vs. RTX 5080 Blackwell Architecture Deep Dive: GB202 vs GB203 Silicon, 32GB GDDR7, DLSS 4 Neural Rendering, and Definitive 4K Ray Tracing BenchmarksFlagship GPU Architecture
18 min read

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 vs. RTX 5080 Blackwell Architecture Deep Dive: GB202 vs GB203 Silicon, 32GB GDDR7, DLSS 4 Neural Rendering, and Definitive 4K Ray Tracing Benchmarks

An exhaustive silicon, GDDR7 memory subsystem, neural rendering, local AI LLM inferencing, and 4K path-tracing analysis comparing NVIDIA's flagship Blackwell graphics cards.

Read Analysis →
Top 3 Viral Travel Gadgets for Flights in 2026 (Tested on YouTube)Viral Travel Hacks
5 min read

Top 3 Viral Travel Gadgets for Flights in 2026 (Tested on YouTube)

We tested the top 3 viral travel gadgets featured on YouTube for airplanes and airports. Discover the hands-free luggage cup holder, hooded blackout neck pillow, and airplane tray table phone mount with direct Amazon buy options.

Read Analysis →
Sony WH-1000XM6 & XM5 vs. Bose QuietComfort Ultra vs. Apple AirPods Max (USB-C): The Definitive Flagship ANC Showdown (2026)Ultimate Audio Shootout
16 min read

Sony WH-1000XM6 & XM5 vs. Bose QuietComfort Ultra vs. Apple AirPods Max (USB-C): The Definitive Flagship ANC Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive acoustic, DSP silicon, active noise cancellation, and spatial audio showdown comparing Sony, Bose, and Apple flagship wireless headphones.

Read Analysis →