Tab M7 vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
Tab M7
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
WHY IS Tab M7 BETTER THAN Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Tab M7 | Samsung SM-G1600 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 3,590 mAh | 1,950 mAh | +3,590 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 2 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 7" | 3.8" | 7" |
| Chassis Weight | 236g | 160g | 160g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Tab M7 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Tab M7 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Tab M7 vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Which is better: Tab M7 or Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
Tab M7 leads with an overall BeastScore of 60.8/100 compared to Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Larger battery capacity: 3,590 mAh (+1,640 mAh more) and Significantly larger display: 7" vs max 3.8" for media & multitasking.
What are the primary battery and display differences between Tab M7 and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
Tab M7 is equipped with a 7-inch display and 3590 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) features a 3.8-inch display and 1950 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Tab M7 and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Tab M7 achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) scores 60/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Galaxy Folder2
Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE
Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
More Smartphones Battles
Tab M7 vs Galaxy Folder2
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Galaxy Folder2
Tab M7 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Tab M7 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Tab M7 vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Hardware Deep DiveASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive architectural deep dive comparing the ASUS ROG Ally X, Valve Steam Deck OLED, and Lenovo Legion Go across AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs. custom Sephiroth APUs, 80Wh vs 50Wh vs 49.2Wh battery thermals, RDNA 3 compute, SteamOS vs Windows 11 optimization, and real-world frametimes.