BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/vivo Pad vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Lab Benchmark Battle

vivo Pad vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
vivo

vivo Pad

vivo Pad
95/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
86/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS vivo Pad BETTER THAN Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

vivo PadWinner 🏆
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORvivo PadSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity8,040 mAh4,400 mAh+8,040 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display SizeN/A7.6"7.6"
Chassis Weight489g271g271g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo Pad:
  • Larger 8,040 mAh battery capacity (+3,640 mAh more capacity)
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
  • 218g lighter chassis (271g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 7.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
Specificationvivo PadSamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 12, OriginOS HDAndroid 11, up to 4 major upgrades
ram gb812
camerasmain, selfie
displayIPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 (1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density))Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) 7.6" (1768x2208 pixels) 372 PPI
weight g489271
dimensions253.2 x 164.7 x 6.6 mm
os version1211
battery mah80404400
connectivitynfc: Yes, usb: USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, magnetic connector, wlan: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, bluetooth: 5.2, A2DP, LE
release date2022-04-112021-08-01
charging wired w44
storage options gb128, 256256, 512
socQualcomm Snapdragon
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

vivo Pad edges ahead with a BeastScore of 95.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, vivo Pad ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose vivo Pad:
Higher overall BeastScore: 95.0 vs top rival 86.0 · Larger battery capacity: 8,040 mAh (+3,640 mAh more)
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
Significantly larger display: 7.6" vs max 0" for media & multitasking · Lighter body: 271g (218g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: vivo Pad vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Which is better: vivo Pad or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

vivo Pad leads with an overall BeastScore of 95.0/100 compared to Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G (86.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 95.0 vs top rival 86.0 and Larger battery capacity: 8,040 mAh (+3,640 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between vivo Pad and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

vivo Pad is equipped with a display and 8040 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between vivo Pad and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

In objective hardware benchmarks, vivo Pad achieves a 94/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G scores 88/100.