BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/vivo Pad SE vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Lab Benchmark Battle

vivo Pad SE vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
vivo

vivo Pad SE

vivo Pad SE
94/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
86/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS vivo Pad SE BETTER THAN Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

vivo Pad SEWinner 🏆
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORvivo PadSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity8,500 mAh4,400 mAh+8,500 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display SizeN/A7.6"7.6"
Chassis Weight559g271g271g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo Pad SE:
  • Larger 8,500 mAh battery capacity (+4,100 mAh more capacity)
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
  • 288g lighter chassis (271g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 7.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
Specificationvivo Pad SESamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 15, OriginOS 5 HDAndroid 11, up to 4 major upgrades
ram gb812
camerasmain, selfiemain, selfie
displayIPS LCD, 90Hz, 600 nits (1600x2464 pixels)Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) 7.6" (1768x2208 pixels) 372 PPI
weight g559271
os version1511
battery mah85004400
connectivitynfc: No, usb: USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, wifi: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, bluetooth: 4.2, A2DP
release date2025-04-252021-08-01
storage options gb6, 8, 128, 256256, 512
socQualcomm Snapdragon
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

vivo Pad SE edges ahead with a BeastScore of 94.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, vivo Pad SE ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose vivo Pad SE:
Higher overall BeastScore: 94.0 vs top rival 86.0 · Larger battery capacity: 8,500 mAh (+4,100 mAh more)
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
Significantly larger display: 7.6" vs max 0" for media & multitasking · Lighter body: 271g (288g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: vivo Pad SE vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Which is better: vivo Pad SE or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

vivo Pad SE leads with an overall BeastScore of 94.0/100 compared to Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G (86.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 94.0 vs top rival 86.0 and Larger battery capacity: 8,500 mAh (+4,100 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between vivo Pad SE and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

vivo Pad SE is equipped with a display and 8500 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between vivo Pad SE and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

In objective hardware benchmarks, vivo Pad SE achieves a 94/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G scores 88/100.