Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G BETTER THAN Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Xiaomi Redmi | Samsung Galaxy | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 6,650 mAh | 4,400 mAh | +6,650 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 8.7" | 7.6" | 8.7" |
| Chassis Weight | 375g | 271g | 271g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.0/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Which is better: Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.0/100 compared to Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 (79.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 79.0 and Lighter body: 271g (104g lighter in hand).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 is equipped with a 8.7-inch display and 6650 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G scores 88/100.
Related Tablets & iPads (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Find N 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PEUM00
Find N 2021 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PEUM00
Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB
Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
More Tablets & iPads Battles
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 vs Find N 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PEUM00
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 vs Find N 2021 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PEUM00
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G vs Apple iPad Air 11 5G (2026)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 vs Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G vs Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 vs Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G vs OnePlus Turbo 6X Pro 5G
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Flagship GPU ArchitectureNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 vs. RTX 5080 Blackwell Architecture Deep Dive: GB202 vs GB203 Silicon, 32GB GDDR7, DLSS 4 Neural Rendering, and Definitive 4K Ray Tracing Benchmarks
An exhaustive silicon, GDDR7 memory subsystem, neural rendering, local AI LLM inferencing, and 4K path-tracing analysis comparing NVIDIA's flagship Blackwell graphics cards.