BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Honor MagicWatch 2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Lab Benchmark Battle

Honor MagicWatch 2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartwatches Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
HONOR

Honor MagicWatch 2

Honor MagicWatch 2
91/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
86/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Honor MagicWatch 2 BETTER THAN Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Honor MagicWatch 2Winner 🏆
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORHonor MagicWatchSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity455 mAh4,400 mAh+4,400 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size1.39"7.6"7.6"
Chassis Weight41g271g41g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Honor MagicWatch 2:
  • 230g lighter chassis (41g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 1.39" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
  • Larger 4,400 mAh battery capacity (+3,945 mAh more capacity)
  • 7.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationHonor MagicWatch 2Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Smartwatches)
osProprietary OSAndroid 11, up to 4 major upgrades
socHonor mobile platform 2019Qualcomm Snapdragon
ram gb412
camerasNonemain, selfie
display1.39" (454x454 pixels) 462 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) 7.6" (1768x2208 pixels) 372 PPI
weight g41271
battery mah4554400
release date2019-12-012021-08-01
storage options gb4256, 512
os version11
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Honor MagicWatch 2 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 91.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Honor MagicWatch 2 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Honor MagicWatch 2:
Higher overall BeastScore: 91.0 vs top rival 86.0 · Lighter body: 41g (230g lighter in hand)
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+3,945 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 7.6" vs max 1.39" for media & multitasking
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Honor MagicWatch 2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Which is better: Honor MagicWatch 2 or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Honor MagicWatch 2 leads with an overall BeastScore of 91.0/100 compared to Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G (86.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 91.0 vs top rival 86.0 and Lighter body: 41g (230g lighter in hand).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Honor MagicWatch 2 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Honor MagicWatch 2 is equipped with a 1.39-inch display and 455 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Honor MagicWatch 2 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Honor MagicWatch 2 achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G scores 88/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →