Huawei Honor X1 / Mediapad X1 7.0 LTE-A 7D-504L vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
Huawei Honor X1 / Mediapad X1 7.0 LTE-A 7D-504L
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
WHY IS Huawei Honor X1 / Mediapad X1 7.0 LTE-A 7D-504L BETTER THAN Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Huawei Honor | Samsung SM-G1600 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 1,500 mAh | 1,950 mAh | +1,950 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 7.01" | 3.8" | 7.01" |
| Chassis Weight | 239g | 160g | 160g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Huawei Honor X1 / Mediapad X1 7.0 LTE-A 7D-504L edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Huawei Honor X1 / Mediapad X1 7.0 LTE-A 7D-504L ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Huawei Honor X1 / Mediapad X1 7.0 LTE-A 7D-504L vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Which is better: Huawei Honor X1 / Mediapad X1 7.0 LTE-A 7D-504L or Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
Huawei Honor X1 / Mediapad X1 7.0 LTE-A 7D-504L leads with an overall BeastScore of 60.8/100 compared to Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Significantly larger display: 7.01" vs max 3.8" for media & multitasking.
What are the primary battery and display differences between Huawei Honor X1 / Mediapad X1 7.0 LTE-A 7D-504L and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
Huawei Honor X1 / Mediapad X1 7.0 LTE-A 7D-504L is equipped with a 7.01-inch display and 1500 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) features a 3.8-inch display and 1950 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Huawei Honor X1 / Mediapad X1 7.0 LTE-A 7D-504L and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Huawei Honor X1 / Mediapad X1 7.0 LTE-A 7D-504L achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) scores 60/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Galaxy Folder2
Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE
Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
More Smartphones Battles
Huawei Honor X1 / Mediapad X1 7.0 LTE-A 7D-504L vs Galaxy Folder2
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Galaxy Folder2
Huawei Honor X1 / Mediapad X1 7.0 LTE-A 7D-504L vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Huawei Honor X1 / Mediapad X1 7.0 LTE-A 7D-504L vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Huawei Honor X1 / Mediapad X1 7.0 LTE-A 7D-504L vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
2026 Foldable BenchmarksGoogle Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. OnePlus Open vs. Honor Magic V3: The Definitive Flagship Book-Style Foldable Architecture, Dual-Screen Ergonomics, Hinge Engineering, Multitasking OS, Periscope Cameras, and Battery Durability Showdown (2026)
A comprehensive 2026 technical breakdown comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6, OnePlus Open, and Honor Magic V3 across aerospace hinge mechanisms, UTG crease dispersion, Tensor G4 vs. Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 silicon, Open Canvas vs. One UI 6.1.1 multitasking, Hasselblad & periscope optical sensors, and third-gen silicon-carbon battery endurance.
Flagship Wearables ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Ring vs. Oura Ring 4 vs. Ultrahuman Ring AIR vs. RingConn Gen 2: The Definitive Smart Ring Health Sensing Architecture, Optical PPG Arrays, Titanium Unibody Durability, Sleep Apnea Detection, HRV Staging, Battery Endurance, and No-Subscription Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-tested architectural showdown comparing the Samsung Galaxy Ring, Oura Ring 4, Ultrahuman Ring AIR, and RingConn Gen 2 across multi-path optical PPG sensors, medical-grade sleep staging, FDA sleep apnea detection, titanium unibody durability, battery engineering, and total cost of ownership.