BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/MediaPad M2 10.0 vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Lab Benchmark Battle

MediaPad M2 10.0 vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Huawei · 2016

MediaPad M2 10.0

MediaPad M2 10.0
70/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Google · 2025

Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)

Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
71/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu) BETTER THAN MediaPad M2 10.0?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

MediaPad M2 10.0
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORMediaPad M2Google PixelLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity6,660 mAh5,100 mAh+6,660 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera Sensor13 MPN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size10.1"6.3"10.1"
Chassis Weight500g185.9g185.9g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy MediaPad M2 10.0:
  • Larger 6,660 mAh battery capacity (+1,560 mAh more capacity)
  • 13MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • 10.1" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu):
  • 314.1g lighter chassis (185.9g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 6.3" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationMediaPad M2 10.0Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
1. Display & Screen🏆 MediaPad M2 10.0 Wins Display
Screen Type & TechIPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colorsAM-OLED display
Screen Size10.1"6.3"
Resolution & Density1200x1920 (224 ppi)1080x2424 (421 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz ProMotion60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory3 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage2GB / 3GB / 16GB / 64GB128GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 MediaPad M2 10.0 Wins Camera
Primary Camera13 MPN/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens5 MPN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight500 g185.9 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 MediaPad M2 10.0 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity6,660 mAh5,100 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, hotspotWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth4.0, A2DP, EDR, LEBluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedmicroUSB 2.0USB Type-C
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 71.4/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose MediaPad M2 10.0:
Larger battery capacity: 6,660 mAh (+1,560 mAh more) · Higher resolution main sensor: 13 MP vs max 0 MP
When to choose Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu):
Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.4 · More system memory: 8GB RAM vs max 3GB
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: MediaPad M2 10.0 vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)

Which is better: MediaPad M2 10.0 or Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)?

Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu) leads with an overall BeastScore of 71.4/100 compared to MediaPad M2 10.0 (70.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.4 and More system memory: 8GB RAM vs max 3GB.

What are the primary battery and display differences between MediaPad M2 10.0 and Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)?

MediaPad M2 10.0 is equipped with a 10.1-inch display and 6660 mAh battery, while Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu) features a 6.3-inch display and 5100 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between MediaPad M2 10.0 and Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)?

In objective hardware benchmarks, MediaPad M2 10.0 achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu) scores 80/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read Analysis →
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)Flagship Camera Shootout
14 min read

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)

An architectural teardown and real-world imaging shootout across Apple's 48MP Fusion quad-pixel sensor with 4K120 ProRes LOG, Samsung's 200MP ISOCELL HP2 Quad-Tele system with ProVisual AI Engine, and Google's 50MP GNK sensor paired with Tensor G4 HDRnet and Night Sight Video.

Read Analysis →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read Analysis →