MediaPad M2 10.0 vs Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS MediaPad M2 10.0 BETTER THAN Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | MediaPad M2 | Samsung SM-S731U | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 6,660 mAh | 4,900 mAh | +6,660 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 13 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 10.1" | 6.74" | 10.1" |
| Chassis Weight | 500g | 190g | 190g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄MediaPad M2 10.0 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 70.4/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, MediaPad M2 10.0 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: MediaPad M2 10.0 vs Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)
Which is better: MediaPad M2 10.0 or Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)?
MediaPad M2 10.0 leads with an overall BeastScore of 70.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) (69.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 70.4 vs top rival 69.8 and Larger battery capacity: 6,660 mAh (+1,760 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between MediaPad M2 10.0 and Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)?
MediaPad M2 10.0 is equipped with a 10.1-inch display and 6660 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) features a 6.74-inch display and 4900 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between MediaPad M2 10.0 and Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, MediaPad M2 10.0 achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) scores 80/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung SM-S711J Galaxy S23 FE 5G TD-LTE 256GB SCG24 (Samsung S711)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)

OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB IV2201 (BBK Ivan)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 21121210G (Xiaomi Ingres)

BBK Vivo X90s 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2241HA (BBK V2241HA)

Oppo Reno8 T 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 BD KH 128GB CPH2505 (BBK 2505)

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
More Smartphones Battles
MediaPad M2 10.0 vs Samsung SM-S711J Galaxy S23 FE 5G TD-LTE 256GB SCG24 (Samsung S711)
Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) vs Samsung SM-S711J Galaxy S23 FE 5G TD-LTE 256GB SCG24 (Samsung S711)
MediaPad M2 10.0 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
MediaPad M2 10.0 vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
MediaPad M2 10.0 vs OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB IV2201 (BBK Ivan)
Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) vs OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB IV2201 (BBK Ivan)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)
An architectural teardown and real-world imaging shootout across Apple's 48MP Fusion quad-pixel sensor with 4K120 ProRes LOG, Samsung's 200MP ISOCELL HP2 Quad-Tele system with ProVisual AI Engine, and Google's 50MP GNK sensor paired with Tensor G4 HDRnet and Night Sight Video.

