MediaPad M3 8.4 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
MediaPad M3 8.4
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
WHY IS MediaPad M3 8.4 BETTER THAN Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | MediaPad M3 | Google Pixel | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 5,100 mAh | 4,410 mAh | +5,100 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 8 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 8.4" | 6.14" | 8.4" |
| Chassis Weight | 326g | 178g | 178g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄MediaPad M3 8.4 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 67.4/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, MediaPad M3 8.4 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: MediaPad M3 8.4 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Which is better: MediaPad M3 8.4 or Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)?
MediaPad M3 8.4 leads with an overall BeastScore of 67.4/100 compared to Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay) (66.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 67.4 vs top rival 66.2 and Larger battery capacity: 5,100 mAh (+690 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between MediaPad M3 8.4 and Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)?
MediaPad M3 8.4 is equipped with a 8.4-inch display and 5100 mAh battery, while Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay) features a 6.14-inch display and 4410 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between MediaPad M3 8.4 and Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, MediaPad M3 8.4 achieves a 64/100 performance score, while Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay) scores 72/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung SM-A253C Galaxy A25 5G 2025 TD-LTE JP 64GB (Samsung A253)
Apple iPhone 16e 5G A3408 Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA CA MX 128GB (Apple iPhone 17,5)
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Redmi 14C 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2411DRN47G (Xiaomi Flame Blaze)
BBK Vivo Y56 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB V2225 (BBK V2225)
Oppo A60 5G 2024 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V2 128GB CPH2683 / A3 (BBK 2683)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
More Smartphones Battles
MediaPad M3 8.4 vs Samsung SM-A253C Galaxy A25 5G 2025 TD-LTE JP 64GB (Samsung A253)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay) vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
MediaPad M3 8.4 vs Apple iPhone 16e 5G A3408 Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA CA MX 128GB (Apple iPhone 17,5)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
MediaPad M3 8.4 vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay) vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
MediaPad M3 8.4 vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Flagship Camera ShootoutiPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)
An architectural teardown and real-world imaging shootout across Apple's 48MP Fusion quad-pixel sensor with 4K120 ProRes LOG, Samsung's 200MP ISOCELL HP2 Quad-Tele system with ProVisual AI Engine, and Google's 50MP GNK sensor paired with Tensor G4 HDRnet and Night Sight Video.
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.