MediaPad M3 8.4 vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
MediaPad M3 8.4
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
WHY IS Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) BETTER THAN MediaPad M3 8.4?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | MediaPad M3 | Google Pixel | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 5,100 mAh | 4,385 mAh | +5,100 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 8 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 8.4" | 6.1" | 8.4" |
| Chassis Weight | 326g | 193.5g | 193.5g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 68.2/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: MediaPad M3 8.4 vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
Which is better: MediaPad M3 8.4 or Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)?
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) leads with an overall BeastScore of 68.2/100 compared to MediaPad M3 8.4 (67.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 68.2 vs top rival 67.4 and More system memory: 8GB RAM vs max 4GB.
What are the primary battery and display differences between MediaPad M3 8.4 and Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)?
MediaPad M3 8.4 is equipped with a 8.4-inch display and 5100 mAh battery, while Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) features a 6.1-inch display and 4385 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between MediaPad M3 8.4 and Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, MediaPad M3 8.4 achieves a 64/100 performance score, while Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) scores 80/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)
Apple iPhone 16e 5G A3408 Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA CA MX 128GB (Apple iPhone 17,5)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)
Xiaomi Mi 12 Lite 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2203129G (Xiaomi Taoyao)
BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
Oppo Reno 7 A 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 128GB A201OP (BBK 2353)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
More Smartphones Battles
MediaPad M3 8.4 vs Samsung SM-A253C Galaxy A25 5G 2025 TD-LTE JP 64GB (Samsung A253)
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) vs Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)
MediaPad M3 8.4 vs Apple iPhone 16e 5G A3408 Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA CA MX 128GB (Apple iPhone 17,5)
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) vs Apple iPhone 16e 5G A3408 Dual SIM TD-LTE MEA CA MX 128GB (Apple iPhone 17,5)
MediaPad M3 8.4 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
MediaPad M3 8.4 vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) vs OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Flagship Camera ShootoutiPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)
An architectural teardown and real-world imaging shootout across Apple's 48MP Fusion quad-pixel sensor with 4K120 ProRes LOG, Samsung's 200MP ISOCELL HP2 Quad-Tele system with ProVisual AI Engine, and Google's 50MP GNK sensor paired with Tensor G4 HDRnet and Night Sight Video.
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.