BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Memo Pad 7 ME572C vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Lab Benchmark Battle

Memo Pad 7 ME572C vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Asus · 2014

Memo Pad 7 ME572C

Memo Pad 7 ME572C
61/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2016

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
61/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Memo Pad 7 ME572C BETTER THAN Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Memo Pad 7 ME572CWinner 🏆
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORMemo PadSamsung SM-G1600LEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity3,950 mAh1,950 mAh+3,950 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera Sensor5 MPN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size7"3.8"7"
Chassis Weight269g160g160g Lightest
Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Memo Pad 7 ME572C:
  • ✓Larger 3,950 mAh battery capacity (+2,000 mAh more capacity)
  • ✓5MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160):
  • ✓109g lighter chassis (160g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓3.8" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationMemo Pad 7 ME572CSamsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
1. Display & Screen🏆 Memo Pad 7 ME572C Wins Display
Screen Type & TechIPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colorsColor TN-TFT LCD display
Screen Size7"3.8"
Resolution & Density1200x1920 (323 ppi)480x800 (245 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz ProMotion60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Memo Pad 7 ME572C Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory2 GB LPDDR2 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage2GB / 32GB16GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Memo Pad 7 ME572C Wins Camera
Primary Camera5 MPN/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens2 MPN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight269 g160 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Memo Pad 7 ME572C Wins Battery
Battery Capacity3,950 mAh1,950 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspotWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth4.0, A2DPBluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedmicroUSB 2.0, USB HostUSB Type-C
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Memo Pad 7 ME572C edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Memo Pad 7 ME572C ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Memo Pad 7 ME572C:
Larger battery capacity: 3,950 mAh (+2,000 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 7" vs max 3.8" for media & multitasking
When to choose Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160):
Lighter body: 160g (109g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Memo Pad 7 ME572C vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Which is better: Memo Pad 7 ME572C or Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

Memo Pad 7 ME572C leads with an overall BeastScore of 60.8/100 compared to Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Larger battery capacity: 3,950 mAh (+2,000 mAh more) and Significantly larger display: 7" vs max 3.8" for media & multitasking.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Memo Pad 7 ME572C and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

Memo Pad 7 ME572C is equipped with a 7-inch display and 3950 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) features a 3.8-inch display and 1950 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Memo Pad 7 ME572C and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Memo Pad 7 ME572C achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) scores 60/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Galaxy Folder2
Samsung

Galaxy Folder2

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Apple

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Google

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE

Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m
Oppo

Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Related Showdowns

More Smartphones Battles

Head-to-Head

Memo Pad 7 ME572C vs Galaxy Folder2

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Galaxy Folder2

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Memo Pad 7 ME572C vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Memo Pad 7 ME572C vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Memo Pad 7 ME572C vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 "Strix Halo" Deep Dive: 16 Zen 5 Cores, 40-CU RDNA 3.5, 128GB Unified Memory, and Local LLM ArchitectureHARDWARE DEEP DIVE
14 min read

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 "Strix Halo" Deep Dive: 16 Zen 5 Cores, 40-CU RDNA 3.5, 128GB Unified Memory, and Local LLM Architecture

A complete architectural breakdown of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (Strix Halo): 16 full Zen 5 cores, Radeon 8060S with 40 RDNA 3.5 compute units, 128GB unified LPDDR5X-8533 memory, 32MB MALL cache, and local AI benchmarks.

Read Analysis →
Apple M4 Max & M4 Pro Silicon Deep Dive: 3nm Architecture, 128GB Unified Memory, Thunderbolt 5, and Benchmark BreakdownSilicon Deep Dive
14 min read

Apple M4 Max & M4 Pro Silicon Deep Dive: 3nm Architecture, 128GB Unified Memory, Thunderbolt 5, and Benchmark Breakdown

An architectural deep dive into Apple's M4 Pro and M4 Max silicon: 2nd-gen 3nm lithography, 546 GB/s memory bandwidth, 2x ray-tracing throughput, Thunderbolt 5, and real-world benchmarks across LLMs, 3D rendering, and video production.

Read Analysis →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read Analysis →