BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Micromax Funbook Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Lab Benchmark Battle

Micromax Funbook Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Micromax

Micromax Funbook Pro

Micromax Funbook Pro
73/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
86/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G BETTER THAN Micromax Funbook Pro?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Micromax Funbook Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORMicromax FunbookSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity5,600 mAh4,400 mAh+5,600 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size10.1"7.6"10.1"
Chassis Weight150g271g150g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Micromax Funbook Pro:
  • 121g lighter chassis (150g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • Larger 5,600 mAh battery capacity (+1,200 mAh more capacity)
  • 10.1" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
  • 7.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationMicromax Funbook ProSamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 4.0.3Android 11, up to 4 major upgrades
soc1.2 GHz Cortex-A8Qualcomm Snapdragon
ram gb112
camerasmainmain, selfie
displayTFT 10.1" (600x1024 pixels) 118 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) 7.6" (1768x2208 pixels) 372 PPI
weight g150271
os version4.0.311
battery mah56004400
release date2012-08-012021-08-01
storage options gb8256, 512
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Micromax Funbook Pro:
Larger battery capacity: 5,600 mAh (+1,200 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 10.1" vs max 7.6" for media & multitasking
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 73.0
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Micromax Funbook Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Which is better: Micromax Funbook Pro or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.0/100 compared to Micromax Funbook Pro (73.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 73.0.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Micromax Funbook Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Micromax Funbook Pro is equipped with a 10.1-inch display and 5600 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Micromax Funbook Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Micromax Funbook Pro achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G scores 88/100.