Motorola MOTO XT711 (Motorola Sholes Tablet) vs Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS Motorola MOTO XT711 (Motorola Sholes Tablet) BETTER THAN Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Motorola MOTO | Xiaomi Mi4 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 1,390 mAh | 3,080 mAh | +3,080 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 3.67" | 5" | 5" |
| Chassis Weight | 160g | 149g | 149g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Motorola MOTO XT711 (Motorola Sholes Tablet) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Motorola MOTO XT711 (Motorola Sholes Tablet) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Motorola MOTO XT711 (Motorola Sholes Tablet) vs Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Which is better: Motorola MOTO XT711 (Motorola Sholes Tablet) or Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
Motorola MOTO XT711 (Motorola Sholes Tablet) leads with an overall BeastScore of 60.8/100 compared to Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Balanced specifications with Motorola hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.
What are the primary battery and display differences between Motorola MOTO XT711 (Motorola Sholes Tablet) and Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
Motorola MOTO XT711 (Motorola Sholes Tablet) is equipped with a 3.67-inch display and 1390 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) features a 5-inch display and 3080 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Motorola MOTO XT711 (Motorola Sholes Tablet) and Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Motorola MOTO XT711 (Motorola Sholes Tablet) achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) scores 60/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Galaxy Folder2

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Hongmi / Redmi 2013022 (Xiaomi Red Rice)

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE

Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
More Smartphones Battles
Motorola MOTO XT711 (Motorola Sholes Tablet) vs Galaxy Folder2
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Galaxy Folder2
Motorola MOTO XT711 (Motorola Sholes Tablet) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Motorola MOTO XT711 (Motorola Sholes Tablet) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Motorola MOTO XT711 (Motorola Sholes Tablet) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
TeaserMotorola starts teasing its own wide foldable smartphone in response to the iPhone Duo
Motorola has published official teaser sketches of an upcoming wide-format book-style foldable aimed at competing directly with the iPhone Duo and Galaxy Fold.
Flagship SoC ArchitectureSnapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs. Apple A18 Pro: The Definitive 3nm Mobile Silicon Architecture, GPU Ray Tracing & Gaming Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 3nm architectural deep dive comparing Qualcomm custom Oryon CPU, MediaTek All-Big-Core Dimensity 9400, and Apple A18 Pro—covering microarchitecture, Adreno 830 vs Immortalis-G925 ray tracing, NPU compute, thermal throttling, and real-world gaming frame rates.
Flagship GPU ArchitectureNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 vs. RTX 5080 Blackwell Architecture Deep Dive: GB202 vs GB203 Silicon, 32GB GDDR7, DLSS 4 Neural Rendering, and Definitive 4K Ray Tracing Benchmarks
An exhaustive silicon, GDDR7 memory subsystem, neural rendering, local AI LLM inferencing, and 4K path-tracing analysis comparing NVIDIA's flagship Blackwell graphics cards.
