BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Plum Optimax 2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Lab Benchmark Battle

Plum Optimax 2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Plum

Plum Optimax 2

Plum Optimax 2
70/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
86/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G BETTER THAN Plum Optimax 2?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Plum Optimax 2
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORPlum OptimaxSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity2,400 mAh4,400 mAh+4,400 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size7"7.6"7.6"
Chassis Weight270g271g270g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Plum Optimax 2:
  • 1g lighter chassis (270g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
  • Larger 4,400 mAh battery capacity (+2,000 mAh more capacity)
  • 7.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationPlum Optimax 2Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 6.0 (Marshmallow)Android 11, up to 4 major upgrades
ram gb112
camerasmainmain, selfie
displayTN TFT capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors 7" (600x1024) 170 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) 7.6" (1768x2208 pixels) 372 PPI
weight g270271
os version6.011
battery mah24004400
connectivitygps: No, usb: microUSB 2.0, wlan: Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot, bluetooth: 2.1
release date2018-03-012021-08-01
storage options gb8256, 512
socQualcomm Snapdragon
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Plum Optimax 2:
Balanced specifications with Plum hardware design · Runs Android 6.0 (Marshmallow) with optimized security support
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 70.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+2,000 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Plum Optimax 2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Which is better: Plum Optimax 2 or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.0/100 compared to Plum Optimax 2 (70.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 70.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+2,000 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Plum Optimax 2 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Plum Optimax 2 is equipped with a 7-inch display and 2400 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Plum Optimax 2 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Plum Optimax 2 achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G scores 88/100.