BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Samsung Gear Live vs Allwatch Hybrid S
Lab Benchmark Battle

Samsung Gear Live vs Allwatch Hybrid S

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartwatches Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Samsung

Samsung Gear Live

Samsung Gear Live
70/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Allview

Allwatch Hybrid S

Allwatch Hybrid S
81/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Allwatch Hybrid S BETTER THAN Samsung Gear Live?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Samsung Gear Live
Allwatch Hybrid SWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORSamsung GearAllwatch HybridLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity300 mAh1,500 mAh+1,500 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display SizeN/A1.22"6.1"
Chassis Weight59g88g59g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Samsung Gear Live:
  • 29g lighter chassis (59g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
Reasons to buy Allwatch Hybrid S:
  • Larger 1,500 mAh battery capacity (+1,200 mAh more capacity)
  • 1.22" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationSamsung Gear LiveAllwatch Hybrid S
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Smartwatches)
osAndroid Wear OSFeature phone
socQualcomm MSM8226 Snapdragon 400Allview mobile platform 2018
ram gb0.51
displaySuper AMOLED (320 x 320 pixels (~278 ppi density))LCD touchscreen 1.22" (240x240) 278 PPI
weight g5988
battery mah3001500
connectivitynfc: No, usb: No, wlan: No, bluetooth: 4.0, LEbluetooth: 4.2, A2DP, LE
release date2014-06-012018-01-01
storage options gb4
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Allwatch Hybrid S edges ahead with a BeastScore of 81.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Allwatch Hybrid S ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Samsung Gear Live:
Lighter body: 59g (29g lighter in hand)
When to choose Allwatch Hybrid S:
Higher overall BeastScore: 81.0 vs top rival 70.0 · Larger battery capacity: 1,500 mAh (+1,200 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Samsung Gear Live vs Allwatch Hybrid S

Which is better: Samsung Gear Live or Allwatch Hybrid S?

Allwatch Hybrid S leads with an overall BeastScore of 81.0/100 compared to Samsung Gear Live (70.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 81.0 vs top rival 70.0 and Larger battery capacity: 1,500 mAh (+1,200 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Samsung Gear Live and Allwatch Hybrid S?

Samsung Gear Live is equipped with a display and 300 mAh battery, while Allwatch Hybrid S features a 1.22-inch display and 1500 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Samsung Gear Live and Allwatch Hybrid S?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Samsung Gear Live achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Allwatch Hybrid S scores 88/100.