BeastCompare

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs vivo Y18e: Which One Should You Buy?

vivo Y18e edges ahead with a BeastScore of 79.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2020

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
79/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Vivo · 2024

vivo Y18e

vivo Y18e
79/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

vivo Y18e wins 3 of 6 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
2 wins
vivo Y18e
vivo Y18e
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Qvivo Y18e
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedSM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
    90
    70
  • Cameravivo Y18e
    68
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • Batteryvivo Y18e
    78
    86
  • DisplaySM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
    86
    84
  • ConnectivityTie
    55
    55
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • Valuevivo Y18e
    68
    85
Key differences
  • vivo Y18e has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
  • SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q charges faster25W vs 15W
  • vivo Y18e has the bigger screen6.56" vs 6.22"
  • vivo Y18e is lighter185 g vs 282 g
  • SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q has more RAM12 GB vs 4 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
  • ✓12.2 MP main camera
  • ✓6.22" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy vivo Y18e
  • ✓97 g lighter (185 g), easier to hold
  • ✓Bigger 5,000 mAh battery (+500 mAh)
  • ✓6.56" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationSM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Qvivo Y18e
1. Display & Screen🏆 SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q Wins Display
Screen typeAM-OLED displayIPS LCD
Screen Size6.22"6.56"
Resolution & Density816x2260 (386 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (269 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorNot listed Helio G85
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 10Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR4 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB64 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 vivo Y18e Wins Camera
Primary Camera12.2 MPundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens10 MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 vivo Y18e Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight282 g185 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP54
8. Battery & Charging🏆 vivo Y18e Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,500 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging25W wired fast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
BluetoothBluetooth 5.0v5.0
USB Port & SpeedUSB C reversibleUSB Type-C 2.0
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

vivo Y18e wins — BeastScore 79.3/100

After comparing all the specs, vivo Y18e is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 79.3 vs top rival 79.1 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+500 mAh more).

Buy SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q if you want

Significantly faster wired charging: 25W vs max 15W · Higher resolution main sensor: 12.2 MP vs max 0 MP

Buy vivo Y18e if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 79.3 vs top rival 79.1 · Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+500 mAh more)

Common questions

Which is better: SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q or vivo Y18e?

vivo Y18e leads with an overall BeastScore of 79.3/100 compared to SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q (79.1/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 79.3 vs top rival 79.1 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+500 mAh more).

What are the main battery and display differences between SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q and vivo Y18e?

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q has a 6.22-inch display and 4500 mAh battery. vivo Y18e has a 6.56-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q and vivo Y18e compare for speed?

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q scores 90/100 for performance; vivo Y18e scores 70/100.

Similar Smartphones

Galaxy S23
Samsung

Galaxy S23

iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple

iPhone 16 Pro Max

Pixel 7a
Google

Pixel 7a

OnePlus Nord N20 SE
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord N20 SE

Xiaomi Poco M5 (India)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Poco M5 (India)

vivo iQOO Z9 Lite
Vivo

vivo iQOO Z9 Lite

A80
Oppo

A80

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

vivo Y18e vs vivo Y200e

Compare →
vs

vivo Y18t vs vivo Y18e

Compare →
vs

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Galaxy S23

Compare →
vs

vivo Y18e vs Galaxy S23

Compare →
vs

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs iPhone 16 Pro Max

Compare →
vs

vivo Y18e vs iPhone 16 Pro Max

Compare →
vs

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Pixel 7a

Compare →
vs

vivo Y18e vs Pixel 7a

Compare →

Related articles

All articles →
Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbersComparison
6 min read

Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers

A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Definitive Wearable Benchmark
14 min read

Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.

Read →