BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/SmartWatch 3 SWR50 vs Allview Allwatch Hybrid S
Lab Benchmark Battle

SmartWatch 3 SWR50 vs Allview Allwatch Hybrid S

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartwatches Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Sony

SmartWatch 3 SWR50

SmartWatch 3 SWR50
81/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Allview

Allview Allwatch Hybrid S

Allview Allwatch Hybrid S
70/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS SmartWatch 3 SWR50 BETTER THAN Allview Allwatch Hybrid S?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

SmartWatch 3 SWR50Winner 🏆
Allview Allwatch Hybrid S

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORSmartWatch 3Allview AllwatchLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity1,500 mAh200 mAh+1,500 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size1.6"1.22"1.6"
Chassis Weight76g88g76g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy SmartWatch 3 SWR50:
  • 12g lighter chassis (76g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • Larger 1,500 mAh battery capacity (+1,300 mAh more capacity)
  • 1.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Allview Allwatch Hybrid S:
  • 1.22" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationSmartWatch 3 SWR50Allview Allwatch Hybrid S
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Smartwatches)
osAndroidProprietary OS
socQuad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7Allview mobile platform 2018
ram gb11
camerasNone
displayTFT capacitive touchscreen, 65K colors 1.6" (320x320) 283 PPILCD 1.22" (240x240 pixels) 278 PPI
weight g7688
battery mah1500200
connectivitynfc: true, usb: microUSB, wifi: Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g, bluetooth: 4.0, A2DP
release date2014-01-012018-12-01
storage options gb4
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

SmartWatch 3 SWR50 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 81.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, SmartWatch 3 SWR50 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose SmartWatch 3 SWR50:
Higher overall BeastScore: 81.0 vs top rival 70.0 · Larger battery capacity: 1,500 mAh (+1,300 mAh more)
When to choose Allview Allwatch Hybrid S:
Balanced specifications with Allview hardware design · Runs Proprietary OS with optimized security support
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: SmartWatch 3 SWR50 vs Allview Allwatch Hybrid S

Which is better: SmartWatch 3 SWR50 or Allview Allwatch Hybrid S?

SmartWatch 3 SWR50 leads with an overall BeastScore of 81.0/100 compared to Allview Allwatch Hybrid S (70.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 81.0 vs top rival 70.0 and Larger battery capacity: 1,500 mAh (+1,300 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between SmartWatch 3 SWR50 and Allview Allwatch Hybrid S?

SmartWatch 3 SWR50 is equipped with a 1.6-inch display and 1500 mAh battery, while Allview Allwatch Hybrid S features a 1.22-inch display and 200 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between SmartWatch 3 SWR50 and Allview Allwatch Hybrid S?

In objective hardware benchmarks, SmartWatch 3 SWR50 achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Allview Allwatch Hybrid S scores 88/100.