BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/vivo iQOO Pad vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Lab Benchmark Battle

vivo iQOO Pad vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
vivo

vivo iQOO Pad

vivo iQOO Pad
95/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
86/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS vivo iQOO Pad BETTER THAN Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

vivo iQOO PadWinner 🏆
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORvivo iQOOSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity10,000 mAh4,400 mAh+10,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size12.1"7.6"12.1"
Chassis Weight585g271g271g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo iQOO Pad:
  • Larger 10,000 mAh battery capacity (+5,600 mAh more capacity)
  • 12.1" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
  • 314g lighter chassis (271g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 7.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
Specificationvivo iQOO PadSamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 13, OriginOS 3Android 11, up to 4 major upgrades
socDimensity 9000+Qualcomm Snapdragon
ram gb1212
camerasmain, selfiemain, selfie
displayIPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 600 nits 12.1" (1968x2800 pixels) 283 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) 7.6" (1768x2208 pixels) 372 PPI
weight g585271
os version1311
battery mah100004400
release date2023-05-012021-08-01
storage options gb128, 256, 512256, 512
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

vivo iQOO Pad edges ahead with a BeastScore of 95.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, vivo iQOO Pad ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose vivo iQOO Pad:
Higher overall BeastScore: 95.0 vs top rival 86.0 · Larger battery capacity: 10,000 mAh (+5,600 mAh more)
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
Lighter body: 271g (314g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: vivo iQOO Pad vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Which is better: vivo iQOO Pad or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

vivo iQOO Pad leads with an overall BeastScore of 95.0/100 compared to Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G (86.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 95.0 vs top rival 86.0 and Larger battery capacity: 10,000 mAh (+5,600 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between vivo iQOO Pad and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

vivo iQOO Pad is equipped with a 12.1-inch display and 10000 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between vivo iQOO Pad and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

In objective hardware benchmarks, vivo iQOO Pad achieves a 94/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G scores 88/100.