Watch Sport 42mm (1st gen) vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS Watch Sport 42mm (1st gen) BETTER THAN Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Watch Sport | Samsung Galaxy | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 1,500 mAh | 590 mAh | +1,500 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 1.65" | 1.5" | 1.65" |
| Chassis Weight | 150g | 605g | 150g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Watch Sport 42mm (1st gen) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 92.0/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Watch Sport 42mm (1st gen) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Watch Sport 42mm (1st gen) vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
Which is better: Watch Sport 42mm (1st gen) or Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?
Watch Sport 42mm (1st gen) leads with an overall BeastScore of 92.0/100 compared to Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) (92.0/100), driven by advantages in Larger battery capacity: 1,500 mAh (+910 mAh more) and Lighter body: 150g (455g lighter in hand).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Watch Sport 42mm (1st gen) and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?
Watch Sport 42mm (1st gen) is equipped with a 1.65-inch display and 1500 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) features a 1.5-inch display and 590 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Watch Sport 42mm (1st gen) and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Watch Sport 42mm (1st gen) achieves a 94/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) scores 94/100.
Related Smartwatches (Based on Benchmark Scores)
More Smartwatches Battles
Watch Sport 42mm (1st gen) vs Honor Watch ES
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) vs Honor Watch ES
Watch Sport 42mm (1st gen) vs Allview Allwatch
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) vs Allview Allwatch
Watch Sport 42mm (1st gen) vs Allview Allwatch Hybrid S
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) vs Allview Allwatch Hybrid S
Watch Sport 42mm (1st gen) vs Allview Allwatch Hybrid T
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) vs Allview Allwatch Hybrid T
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
Deep DiveSnapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 9400 vs Apple A18 Pro: The Real Winner
We compared the big three 3nm smartphone chipsets under sustained 60-minute gaming loads, measuring frame rate stability, power draw, and thermal throttling.
MarketTrendForce: Apple to capture a quarter of the folding phone market in 2026
TrendForce forecasts Apple will capture 25.2% of worldwide foldable smartphone shipments in 2026 following the iPhone Duo release, reshaping competition with Samsung.
GuideHere are the Apple iPhone Duo alternatives
Explore top alternatives to the $2,000 Apple iPhone Duo, including the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, Xiaomi 18 Fold 5G, Vivo X Fold5 Pro, and OnePlus Open 2.





